RE: [closed] pfps-14 "Social Meaning and RDF"

> From: Graham Klyne [mailto:gk@ninebynine.org] 
> You raised made a last call comment [pfps-14] captured in:
> 
>    http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-14
>
> The RDFCore WG has resolved:
>
>
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0068.html
>
> to accept this comment,
>
> by removing the section on social meaning from the Concepts document,
> per WG proposal:

>
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0029.html

> Please reply to this email, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org indicating
> whether this decision is acceptable.

It is acceptable, though - outside the scope of RDFCore - I need to
think through the ramifications of this being discussed by the
architecture groups.

		- Peter