W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > January to March 2003

RE: Comment on Test Cases

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 11:00:59 +0100
To: "Jan Grant" <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BHEGLCKMOHGLGNOKPGHDMEDACBAA.jjc@hpl.hp.com>

> >
> > moreover,
> > [[
> > I think the test was correct as originally stated and is
> currently incorrect.
> > ]]
> >
> > (I am happy to ignore the procedural issue, really - but I did
> follow the
> > links and was disappointed = i.e. I still can't tell why this test got
> > changed - nor can I tell why I didn't vote against such change)
>
> Brian, please give this an issue number.

Yes please - I disaagree with this test, which is the substantive issue - an
approved test that disagrees with the Syntax doc.


>
> Jeremy, the misunderstanding arose in the following week's teleconference:
>
> 	http://www.w3.org/2003/01/17-rdfcore-irc
>
> the exchange recorded (minimally) starting with timestamp 15:28:45
>
> [[
> 15:28:45 [daveb-scr] gone some pending test cases
> 15:29:03 [daveb-scr] either we approve them or leave till LC process
> 15:29:07 [daveb-scr] bwm: what are pending?
> 15:29:39 [daveb-scr] bwm: weren't they approved last week
> 15:29:47 [daveb-scr] jang: ok
> 15:29:52 [daveb-scr] bwm: approved, done here
> ]]
>
>

Pretty minimalist :).

Jeremy
Received on Friday, 21 February 2003 05:01:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:31 GMT