Issue #macgregor-02 propositional attitudes

At 13:29 28/02/2003 +0000, Graham Klyne wrote:

[...]


>2. The informal example in section 4.1 can be read as suggesting RDF 
>defined means to express propositional attitudes.  We should be clear that 
>propositional attitudes are not supported.

Recorded as

   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#macgregor-02

Thanks again Bob, the WG will consider this and respond in due course.

Brian