W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > January to March 2003

Issue #macgregor-02 propositional attitudes

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 14:38:46 +0000
Message-Id: <>
To: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>, Bob MacGregor <macgregor@ISI.EDU>
Cc: fmanola@mitre.org, www-rdf-comments@w3.org

At 13:29 28/02/2003 +0000, Graham Klyne wrote:


>2. The informal example in section 4.1 can be read as suggesting RDF 
>defined means to express propositional attitudes.  We should be clear that 
>propositional attitudes are not supported.

Recorded as


Thanks again Bob, the WG will consider this and respond in due course.

Received on Friday, 28 February 2003 09:37:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:31 GMT