Issue #macgregor-02 propositional attitudes

• From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
• Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 14:38:46 +0000
• To: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>, Bob MacGregor <macgregor@ISI.EDU>
• Cc: fmanola@mitre.org, www-rdf-comments@w3.org
• Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20030228143712.09d58700@localhost>

At 13:29 28/02/2003 +0000, Graham Klyne wrote:

[...]


>2. The informal example in section 4.1 can be read as suggesting RDF 
>defined means to express propositional attitudes.  We should be clear that 
>propositional attitudes are not supported.

Recorded as

   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#macgregor-02

Thanks again Bob, the WG will consider this and respond in due course.

Brian

Received on Friday, 28 February 2003 09:37:45 UTC