W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > January to March 2003

Issue #pfps-23 sanctioned by?

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2003 10:28:03 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20030301102657.0a2bfe70@localhost>
To: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: RDF comments <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>


>
>
>- clarify the notion of "what is sanctioned by the RDF specification";
>   I think the text about what is sanctioned by RDF may
>   require some clarification:  some rdf/rdfs URIs are
>   reserved by RDF/XML for specific syntactic purposes, and
>   may not be used to denote resources (e.g. rdf:ID);
>   other rdf/rdfs URIs are reserved to identify specific
>   concepts, for which the corresponding resource is
>   constrained by the RDF specifications, and may not be
>   given an interpretation that is at variance with them.

Recorded as

   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-23

Brian
Received on Saturday, 1 March 2003 05:26:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:31 GMT