W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > January to March 2003

[closed] RE: RDF Semantics: Interpretations and Modelling

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 23:49:35 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20030213234839.02ea4310@localhost>
To: "Massimo Marchiori" <massimo@w3.org>, Ossi Nykänen <onykane@butler.cc.tut.fi>, <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>

There having been no response to my request, this comment is closed.

If your response was delayed, please resubmit the comment in a new thread.

Brian

At 19:17 05/02/2003 +0000, Brian McBride wrote:

>At 17:44 03/02/2003 +0100, Massimo Marchiori wrote:
>
>>Brian, please add this as a last-call issue, thanks :)
>
>Just a wee process point here.
>
>I see discussion on rdfcore, and on rdf-interest.  Should I assume from 
>that we have an issue and I should allocate and id for it?  In which case 
>I'd like to see a clear statement of the issue on this list, or referenced 
>from it.  Or are we still clarifying what the issue is?
>
>For your information, where it is difficult to pin down an issue, a test 
>case often helps.  An indication of the significance of the issue can also 
>be helpful.  "I would have done it differently" is rather different from 
>"this will break every browser on the planet".
>
>Brian
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2003 18:48:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:31 GMT