W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > January to March 2003

[closed] Re: Comment on RDF Test Cases

From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 10:32:01 +0000 (GMT)
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org, "jos.deroo.jd" <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0301291030100.11576-100000@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>

On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Jeremy Carroll wrote:

>
>
> This is a last call comment concerning the test case schema
>
> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/testSchema
>
> which I am making wearing the hat of an OWL Test Case editor.
>
> (Sorry I should have made this comment earlier).
>
> Within OWL Tests we reuse the RDF testSchema.
> Unfortunately the rdfs:comment-s within it, do not foresee such reuse. For
> example test:issue should be described as relating a test to an issue, rather
> than a test to an RDF Core issue.
>
> Please generalize the comments on the following resources
>   test:approval
>   test:issue
>   test:status
>
>
> e.g.
>
>     <rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Indicates the status of the test according to
> RDF Core WG process.</rdfs:comment>
>
> =>
>
>     <rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Indicates the status of the test within a
> process, such as the RDF Core WG process.</rdfs:comment>

I'm in complete agreement with this. The comments on the schema document
have been updated to generalise them (in addition, correcting the
comment for NegativeEntailmentTest).

-- 
jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/
Generalisation is never appropriate.
Received on Wednesday, 29 January 2003 05:32:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:31 GMT