[closed] Re: Comment on RDF Test Cases

On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Jeremy Carroll wrote:

>
>
> This is a last call comment concerning the test case schema
>
> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/testSchema
>
> which I am making wearing the hat of an OWL Test Case editor.
>
> (Sorry I should have made this comment earlier).
>
> Within OWL Tests we reuse the RDF testSchema.
> Unfortunately the rdfs:comment-s within it, do not foresee such reuse. For
> example test:issue should be described as relating a test to an issue, rather
> than a test to an RDF Core issue.
>
> Please generalize the comments on the following resources
>   test:approval
>   test:issue
>   test:status
>
>
> e.g.
>
>     <rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Indicates the status of the test according to
> RDF Core WG process.</rdfs:comment>
>
> =>
>
>     <rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Indicates the status of the test within a
> process, such as the RDF Core WG process.</rdfs:comment>

I'm in complete agreement with this. The comments on the schema document
have been updated to generalise them (in addition, correcting the
comment for NegativeEntailmentTest).

-- 
jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/
Generalisation is never appropriate.