W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > January to March 2003

RE: [closed] jjc-01 rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007.rdf

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 15:25:51 +0100
To: "Dave Beckett" <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BHEGLCKMOHGLGNOKPGHDKEEMCBAA.jjc@hpl.hp.com>


This is fine thanks.

Jeremy

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Beckett [mailto:dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk]
> Sent: 20 March 2003 23:06
> To: Jeremy Carroll
> Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
> Subject: [closed] jjc-01 rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007.rdf
>
>
>
> Jeremy
>
> You made a last call comment "Comment on Test Cases" captured in
>
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#jjc-01
>
> The RDFCore WG has resolved
>
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0068.html
>
> to accept this.
>
> Details:
>
> 1. The test case rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007 was
>    erronenously recorded as a negative test by the working group.
>
> 2. We will change:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Ma
> nifest.rdf
>    to make rdfms-nested-bagIDs test007 a test:PositiveParserTest
>
> 3. We will return rdfms-nested-bagIDs test007 to the original version
>    version that stated this as a positive.  This means changing
>
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007.rdf
   FROM:
     rdf:bagID is forbidden on property element prop with an rdf:resource or
     rdf:parseType attribute: the following is in error.
   TO:
     bagID on empty property element construction, with rdf:resource.

4. We note that the working draft section
     http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/#emptyPropertyElt
   consequently does not need to be changed.

This is recorded in the Test Cases Editors Draft change list as
testcaseLCC-001

Please reply to this email, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org indicating
whether this decision is acceptable.

Dave
Received on Friday, 21 March 2003 09:27:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:31 GMT