W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > January to March 2003

RE: language tags in typed RDF literals

From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 10:50:21 +0200
Message-ID: <A03E60B17132A84F9B4BB5EEDE57957B01B90B77@trebe006.europe.nokia.com>
To: <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Cc: <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>


>    ... seemed at the time to be important to Patrick 
> who stated that 
> Nokia felt strongly about the issue.
> 
>    - later Patrick reported that after further thought, that 
> whilst Nokia 
> still preferred the lang tag to be allowed in a datatyped 
> literal, they 
> could live without it.
> 
> ...
>
> >(1) lang tags be forbidden by the RDF syntax from appearing 
> in non-XML 
> >typed literals.

This option is preferred. 

And I would go so far as to remove the XMLLiterals "datatype"
since it is such an odd duck (and even more so if lang tags are
omitted from other typed literals) and revert back to the 
original idea of three kinds of literals: simple, XML, and typed.
Only the first two types of literals take lang tags. 

Patrick


--
Patrick Stickler, Nokia/Finland, (+358 40) 801 9690, patrick.stickler@nokia.com
 
Received on Tuesday, 18 February 2003 03:50:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:31 GMT