W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > January to March 2003

Re: abstract class

From: Marc Carrion <marc_carrion@yahoo.es>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 02:53:49 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <20030206105349.34632.qmail@web11905.mail.yahoo.com>
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, marc@jfcarrion.com, www-rdf-comments@w3.org


--- Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> wrote:
> At 02:00 06/02/2003 -0800, Marc Carrion wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> >    would be true, but if we only have
> >      _:xxx rdf:type rdf:Statement .
> >      _:xxx rdf:subject <ex:a> .
> >      _:xxx rdf:predicate <ex:b> .
> >    that would not be a 'correct' model, I mean
> it's
> >going to have a wrong Resource of type Statement.
> 
> Not true.  That looks like a fine graph to me.
> [...]
> 
> >    I was thinking that Abstract Classes could be
> >defined in the same way.
> 
> Sorry Marc, I'm not following you.  Is this formal
> communication with the 
> working group.  We are in last call at the moment,
> and kinda busy.
> 
> What are you trying to say here?
> 
> Brian
> 

  I'm sorry I don't want to bother you when you are
busy, I'm sure this can wait.

  Marc


=====
......\|||/................................................
      (. .)
-oOOo---0---oOOo-------
|marc_carrion@yahoo.es|
|   ooO  Ooo          |
----( )--( )-----------
     ()  ()

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
Received on Thursday, 6 February 2003 05:53:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:31 GMT