W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > January to March 2003

Re: Comment on RDF Test Cases

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 06:58:45 -0500
To: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, www-rdf-comments@w3.org, "jos.deroo.jd" <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>, RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20030128115845.GH1589@tux.w3.org>

* Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk> [2003-01-28 11:29+0000]
> 
> On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > This is a last call comment concerning the test case schema
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/testSchema
> >
> > which I am making wearing the hat of an OWL Test Case editor.
> >
> > (Sorry I should have made this comment earlier).
> >
> > Within OWL Tests we reuse the RDF testSchema.
> > Unfortunately the rdfs:comment-s within it, do not foresee such reuse. For
> > example test:issue should be described as relating a test to an issue, rather
> > than a test to an RDF Core issue.
> >
> > Please generalize the comments on the following resources
> >   test:approval
> >   test:issue
> >   test:status
> >
> >
> > e.g.
> >
> >     <rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Indicates the status of the test according to
> > RDF Core WG process.</rdfs:comment>
> >
> > =>
> >
> >     <rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Indicates the status of the test within a
> > process, such as the RDF Core WG process.</rdfs:comment>
> >
> >
> > Jeremy Carroll, Editor OWL Test Cases
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-test
> 
> I think doing so makes a lot of sense. I need some indication from chair
> or process expert as to whether this change should be done immediately
> (since the schema lives "outside" the LC WD) or at the end of LC
> process.

As far as I can see, such a change seems both reasonable and timely.
We're not going REC-track with this vocabulary, it's a means to support 
our ends (like Lbase in that respect, or Dublin Core, if we used DC 
in any of our RDF files). Unless someone else objects, I reckon 'go for it'...

Dan
Received on Tuesday, 28 January 2003 07:04:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:31 GMT