W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > January to March 2003

Re: Issue qu-04 RDF/XML serialization

From: Yuzhong Qu <yzqu@seu.edu.cn>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 22:56:50 +0800
Message-ID: <01c401c2efba$1a594a10$9c0b77ca@xobjects>
To: "Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: "rdf-comments" <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>, "Dan Brickley" <danbri@w3.org>

It's fine. Thanks!

Yuzhong Qu

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: "Dan Brickley" <danbri@w3.org>; <yzqu@seu.edu.cn>
Cc: <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>; <brian_mcbride@hp.com>
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:28 PM
Subject: Issue qu-04 RDF/XML serialization


> Recorded as
> 
>    http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#qu-04
> 
> Brian
> 
> At 08:39 21/03/2003 -0500, Dan Brickley wrote:
> >Hi
> >
> >Many thanks for your Last Call review comments on RDF Schema,
> >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0219.html
> >
> >You draw our attention to some potential problems and redundancies with
> >the RDF/XML encoding of the RDF description of RDF and Schema. Some of
> >these are editorial (eg. the extra rdf:type redundancy), while others
> >are more substantive. To ensure that these get careful review from
> >the Working Group, we will track this as a formal issue.
> >
> >Brian, can you open an issue on 'schema serialization ok?' or similar?
> >
> >Thanks for your careful review,
> >
> >Dan
> 
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 21 March 2003 09:55:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:31 GMT