W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > January to March 2003

concepts doc: 404s aren't meaningful?

From: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 09:06:37 -0600
To: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <EA3D32B3-402D-11D7-9F22-0003936780B2@aaronsw.com>

The concepts doc says:

> Issuing an HTTP GET request and obtaining data with a "200 OK" 
> response code is a technical indication that the received data was 
> published at the request URI; but data received with a "404 Not found" 
> response cannot be considered to be similarly published information.

First, the f in Found should probably be capitalized. More importantly 
though, I don't think that last bit is correct. Most people consider 
404 error pages to be published. For example, I think the author of:


would considered it a published document.

Aaron Swartz [http://www.aaronsw.com/]
Received on Friday, 14 February 2003 10:06:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:15:19 UTC