W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > January to March 2003

Re: #hodder-01 WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20030123: RDF/XML with HTML and XHTML

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 16:52:40 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20030213165222.0812bc38@localhost>
To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, Dave Hodder <dmh@dmh.org.uk>
Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org

missed the id in the subject line.

Brian

At 16:21 13/02/2003 +0000, Brian McBride wrote:

>This has been recorded as a last call comment at:
>
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#hodder-01
>
>The WG will respond later with a disposition.
>
>Brian
>
>
>At 10:59 13/02/2003 +0000, Dave Beckett wrote:
>
>> >>>Dave Hodder said:
>> >
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > Regarding the following section:
>> >
>> > 
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20030123/#section-rdf-in-HTML
>> >
>> > I feel it would be beneficial if a complete example was presented to
>> > show how a <link> element could be used.  On the www-html-editor list
>> > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html-editor/2002OctDec/0027.html>
>> > I suggested the following as an example:
>> >
>> >     <link rel="meta"    type="application/rdf+xml"
>> >         title="Dublin Core metadata"    href="dublin-core.rdf"/>
>> >     <link rel="alternate meta"    type="application/ntriples"
>> >         title="Dublin Core metadata (N-Triples)" href="dublin-core.nt"/>
>> >
>> > N.B. I would strongly suggest the use of the linktype 'Alternate' over
>> > the 'Alternative' used in the WD; both 'Alternate' and 'Meta' are in the
>> > latest XHTML 2.0 draft, but 'Alternative' is not.
>>
>>I will consider this suggestion.  We will record this as a last call
>>issue on this document since it is more than a typo.
>>
>>I note (or hope!) that the HTML working group is also looking at this
>>document and at this section in particular and I might try to
>>coordinate comments here.
>>
>> >
>> > There is also a small typo in the second paragraph -- "HTML/HTML" is
>> > referred to instead of "HTML/XHTML".
>>
>>Noted, will fix.
>>
>>Thanks for the feedback.
>>
>>Dave
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2003 11:51:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:31 GMT