W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > January to March 2003

Issue #jjc-01 rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007.rdf

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 13:18:20 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20030224131659.02c729d8@localhost>
To: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org

At 23:02 20/02/2003 +0000, Jan Grant wrote:

>On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>
> > There's a substantive issue but to play games I will start with it as
> >
> > Procedurally:
> >
> > [[
> > The negative testcase
> > rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007.rdf
> >
> > is recorded as having been approved at
> >
> > RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-01-10
> >
> > however it is not recorded as such in the minutes; nor was it in the 
> agenda.
> >
> > I request that the positive test case
> > rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007.rdf
> > as approved at
> >
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Mar/0235.html
> >
> > be shown in this document.
> > ]]
> >
> > moreover,
> > [[
> > I think the test was correct as originally stated and is currently 
> incorrect.
> > ]]
> >
> > (I am happy to ignore the procedural issue, really - but I did follow the
> > links and was disappointed = i.e. I still can't tell why this test got
> > changed - nor can I tell why I didn't vote against such change)
>
>Brian, please give this an issue number.


Jeremy,

This comment has been recorded as

   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#jjc-01

The RDFCore WG will consider this comment and get back to you in due course.

Brian
Received on Monday, 24 February 2003 08:51:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:31 GMT