W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > January to March 2003

Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 16:17:50 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <20030114.161750.68536914.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: GK@ninebynine.org
Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org

From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
Subject: Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 19:57:41 +0000

[...]

> There is one statement in your review that I just don't understand:
> [[
> The list of uses in the motivations section has just about the best example
> of non-parallel construction that I have ever seen.
> ]]
> I think this may be a stylistic matter, but I can't be sure.

Yes, stylistic.  In general, if you say 

     oijo  oijoi ooij o oijoj ojio 
	- blah1
	- blah2
	- blah3
	- blah4

the blahi should belong to the same syntactic category.   The list of
motivations uses several different syntactic categories, and thus should be
changed.

> #g

peter
Received on Tuesday, 14 January 2003 16:18:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:31 GMT