Dave, You made a last call comment "WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20030123: RDF/XML with HTML and XHTML" captured in http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#hodder-01 The RDFCore WG has resolved http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0068.html to accept this comment. Here are the details: 1. We will add an example to http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20030123/#section-rdf-in-HTML showing the correct use of <link> to an alternate RDF/XML form in a small xhtml document. This might be based on the example attached to this message. 2. We will change to recommend using the rel='alternate' rather than 'alternative' value after coordinating with the HTML WG, 3. We note further that there is ongoing coordination work between the HTML and RDF Core WGs on issues of embedding RDF in HTML. This is recorded in the RDF/XML Syntax editors change list as syntaxLCC-002 Please reply to this email, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org indicating whether this decision is acceptable. Thanks Dave
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 18:22:16 GMT