- From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 16:32:04 -0600
- To: reagle@w3.org
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>recorded as > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#reagle-03 > >Brian > > >At 14:47 30/01/2003 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > >> > As an aside, do you intend to actually "require" a particular QName prefix >>> when it says, "which we will refer to as XSD and use the Qname prefix xsd:. >> > "? > Re. the above, the answer is no, it does not. The Semantics document introduces the xsd: Qname as follows (section 0.2): -------- "We will also make extensive use of the Qname prefixes rdf:, rdfs: and xsd: defined as follows: Prefix rdf: namespace URI: http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns# Prefix rdfs: namespace URI: http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema# Prefix xsd: namespace URI: http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema# Since Qname syntax is not legal N-triples syntax, and in the interests of brevity and readability, we will use the convention whereby a Qname is used without surrounding angle brackets to indicate the corresponding uriref enclosed in angle brackets, eg the triple <ex:a> rdf:type rdfs:Property . should be read as an abbreviation for the N-triples syntax <ex:a> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type> <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#Property> ." -------- Does this cover the issue you have raised? Pat Hayes -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes s.pam@ai.uwf.edu for spam
Received on Monday, 3 February 2003 17:30:28 UTC