W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > January to March 2003

Fwd: Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 14:21:32 +0000
Message-Id: <>
To: graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>, jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org

Graham, Jeremy,

I'm suggesting this is one for you guys.


> > [[The RDF specifications define the following classes.]]
> >
> > >  The Concepts document claims otherwise.
> > >What does it mean that the core RDF specifications define a class?  What
> > >does it mean for a thing to be described by RDF?
> >
> > I really have no idea what you are getting at here.  Is there some more
> > specific way you can make this comment?
>Concepts states that
>         Vocabulary terms in the rdf: namespace are defined in section 5.1
>         of the RDF syntax specification.
>but you include several terms form the rdf: namespace in your list.

I think we mean here that the names in the namespace are defined in syntax 
5.1 (which I'm feeling is the wrong place, but it'll do), not that they are 
'defined' in the syntax doc.

What do you think?

Received on Thursday, 2 January 2003 09:20:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:15:19 UTC