- From: Marc Carrion <marc_carrion@yahoo.es>
- Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 08:07:18 -0800 (PST)
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
> PS: On a related note, is
>
> rdfs:Class rdfs:Class rdfs:Class .
>
> allowed?
>
> Section 3.7 of Concepts would indicate not, as
> it uses rdfs:Class for
> a ``purpose not sanctioned [by] the RDF
> specification''. This
> normative caution needs *much* more care in its
> formulation.
>
Of course it should be allowed, because of
rdf1: xxx aaa yyy . ==> aaa rdf:type rdf:Property .
you will be able to infer that rdfs:Class is an
instance of rdf:Property, is that wrong?
Marc.
=====
......\|||/................................................
(. .)
-oOOo---0---oOOo-------
|marc_carrion@yahoo.es|
| ooO Ooo |
----( )--( )-----------
() ()
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
Received on Friday, 31 January 2003 11:07:19 UTC