> PS: On a related note, is > > rdfs:Class rdfs:Class rdfs:Class . > > allowed? > > Section 3.7 of Concepts would indicate not, as > it uses rdfs:Class for > a ``purpose not sanctioned [by] the RDF > specification''. This > normative caution needs *much* more care in its > formulation. > Of course it should be allowed, because of rdf1: xxx aaa yyy . ==> aaa rdf:type rdf:Property . you will be able to infer that rdfs:Class is an instance of rdf:Property, is that wrong? Marc. ===== ......\|||/................................................ (. .) -oOOo---0---oOOo------- |marc_carrion@yahoo.es| | ooO Ooo | ----( )--( )----------- () () __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.comReceived on Friday, 31 January 2003 11:07:19 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 18:22:16 GMT