public-webapps@w3.org from October to December 2010 by date

Thursday, 30 December 2010

• Re: [IndexedDB] Why rely on run-to-completion? Keean Schupke
• Re: [IndexedDB] Why rely on run-to-completion? Jonas Sicking
• Re: [IndexedDB] Why rely on run-to-completion? Axel Rauschmayer
• Re: [IndexedDB] Why rely on run-to-completion? Glenn Maynard
• Re: [IndexedDB] Why rely on run-to-completion? Keean Schupke
• Re: [IndexedDB] Why rely on run-to-completion? Jonas Sicking
• [Bug 11619] who is the president of the United States? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 11619] New: who is the president of the United States? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [IndexedDB] Why rely on run-to-completion? Axel Rauschmayer
• Re: [IndexedDB] Why rely on run-to-completion? Shawn Wilsher
• Re: [IndexedDB] Why rely on run-to-completion? Keean Schupke
• Re: [IndexedDB] Why rely on run-to-completion? Axel Rauschmayer
• Re: Web workers: synchronously handling events Jonas Sicking
• Re: Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Boris Zbarsky

Wednesday, 29 December 2010

• [IndexedDB] Why rely on run-to-completion? Axel Rauschmayer
• Re: Web workers: synchronously handling events Glenn Maynard
• [Bug 11615] New: save text from an editor in a file system bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Web workers: synchronously handling events Jonas Sicking

Tuesday, 28 December 2010

• Re: [Bug 11606] New: wanted: awareness of non-persistent web storage Glenn Maynard
• Re: [Bug 11606] New: wanted: awareness of non-persistent web storage Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Web workers: synchronously handling events Glenn Maynard
• Re: Web workers: synchronously handling events Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: [Bug 11606] New: wanted: awareness of non-persistent web storage Glenn Maynard
• Re: [Bug 11606] New: wanted: awareness of non-persistent web storage Drew Wilson
• Re: [Bug 11606] New: wanted: awareness of non-persistent web storage Glenn Maynard
• Re: [Bug 11606] New: wanted: awareness of non-persistent web storage João Eiras

Monday, 27 December 2010

• [widget] proposal to add defaultlocale attribute to widget element (P&C Spec), was Re: [widgets] Span example Marcos Caceres
• Re: clipboard events Robert O'Callahan
• Web workers: synchronously handling events Glenn Maynard

Thursday, 23 December 2010

• Re: clipboard events Paul Libbrecht

Sunday, 26 December 2010

• Re: clipboard events Paul Libbrecht
• Re: [Bug 11606] New: wanted: awareness of non-persistent web storage Glenn Maynard
• [Bug 11606] New: wanted: awareness of non-persistent web storage bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Friday, 24 December 2010

• Re: clipboard events Hallvord R. M. Steen

Thursday, 23 December 2010

• Added 'locale' to Text, Keyboard, and Composition Events [ISSUE-119] Doug Schepers
• Re: clipboard events Dmitry Titov
• clipboard events Hallvord R. M. Steen

Wednesday, 22 December 2010

• Re: Hash functions Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Hash functions Glenn Maynard
• Re: Hash functions Charles Pritchard
• Re: Hash functions Boris Zbarsky
• [Bug 11589] New: It is said that "Values can be any data type supported by the structured clone algorithm", but the algorithm is not described. In fact is it deeply buried in the HTML5 specification, open to fuzzy interpretations. Values are a fundamental part of any data bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Updates to FileAPI Glenn Maynard
• Re: Rename XBL2 to something without X, B, or L? Dirk Pranke
• Re: Updates to FileAPI Jonas Sicking
• Re: Updates to FileAPI Glenn Maynard

Tuesday, 21 December 2010

• Re: Hash functions Glenn Maynard
• Re: Rename XBL2 to something without X, B, or L? Alex Russell
• Re: DOM event detection Robin Winslow
• Re: DOM event detection Ryan Seddon
• Re: Updates to FileAPI Arun Ranganathan
• Re: Updates to FileAPI Arun Ranganathan
• Re: Updates to FileAPI Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Updates to FileAPI Michael Nordman
• Re: Updates to FileAPI Ian Hickson
• Re: Hash functions Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Updates to FileAPI Arun Ranganathan
• Re: Hash functions Toni Ruottu

Monday, 20 December 2010

• DOM event detection Robin Winslow

Tuesday, 21 December 2010

• Re: Hash functions Glenn Maynard
• Re: Hash functions Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Updates to FileAPI Michael Nordman
• Re: Hash functions Tab Atkins Jr.
• Hash functions Glenn Maynard
• Re: Updates to FileAPI Arun Ranganathan

Monday, 20 December 2010

• Re: Updates to FileAPI Jian Li
• Re: using BlobBuilder append method with generated binary data Ryan Seddon
• [Bug 11581] New: Is there really need to drop http compability ? This will cause lot of troubles in some http-servers and browsers. This will force developers to use ugly hacks like flash/java based implementations. Is there any reason, wht not to create real robust http- bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Updates to FileAPI Ian Hickson
• Re: Updates to FileAPI Arun Ranganathan
• Re: using BlobBuilder append method with generated binary data Toni Ruottu
• Re: Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Hajime Morita

Sunday, 19 December 2010

• file-system-api: filename restrictions Glenn Maynard
• Re: FileAPI use case: making an image downloading app Keean Schupke

Saturday, 18 December 2010

• [Bug 11571] http://mntaxwaste.blogspot.com/ what is this and where did it come from bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: FileAPI use case: making an image downloading app Charles Pritchard
• Re: Updates to FileAPI Arun Ranganathan
• Re: FileAPI use case: making an image downloading app Gregg Tavares (wrk)
• 1st CFP: IJCAI-11 Workshop on Discovering Meaning On the Go in Large & Heterogeneous Data (LHD-11) Michael Chan
• [Bug 11571] New: http://mntaxwaste.blogspot.com/ what is this and where did it come from bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: FileAPI use case: making an image downloading app Charles Pritchard

Friday, 17 December 2010

• FileAPI use case: making an image downloading app Gregg Tavares (wrk)
• Re: Updates to FileAPI Jian Li
• Re: [IndexedDB] Do we need a timeout for VERSION_CHANGE? Jonas Sicking
• Re: [IndexedDB] Do we need a timeout for VERSION_CHANGE? Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [IndexedDB] Do we need a timeout for VERSION_CHANGE? Jonas Sicking
• Re: Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Tab Atkins Jr.
• [Bug 11570] New: Can't find the posibility for user authentication by connecting to a websocket! Missing? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [IndexedDB] KeyRange factory methods Jeremy Orlow
• [Bug 11567] New: IndexedDB should utilize the new WebIDL static feature bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Hajime Morita
• Re: [IndexedDB] Do we need a timeout for VERSION_CHANGE? Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [IndexedDB] KeyRange factory methods Jonas Sicking

Thursday, 16 December 2010

• Re: Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Dimitri Glazkov
• [Bug 11564] New: Remove all references to manually populated indexes bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [IndexedDB] KeyRange factory methods Pablo Castro
• RE: [IndexedDB] Do we need a timeout for VERSION_CHANGE? Pablo Castro
• Re: Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Olli Pettay
• Re: Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Boris Zbarsky
• 答复: Call for Editors for Server-sent Events, Web Storage, and Web Workers 潘松柏
• Re: Rename XBL2 to something without X, B, or L? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Rename XBL2 to something without X, B, or L? Robin Berjon
• Re: [IndexedDB] Do we need a timeout for VERSION_CHANGE? Jeremy Orlow
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Maciej Stachowiak

Wednesday, 15 December 2010

• [IndexedDB] Do we need a timeout for VERSION_CHANGE? Pablo Castro
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Ian Hickson
• RE: [Bug 11553] New: Ensure indexedDBSync is on the right worker interface Pablo Castro
• Re: Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: [widgets] Storage keys and ECMAScript incompatibility? timeless
• Re: Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [widgets] Storage keys and ECMAScript incompatibility? Scott Wilson
• Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: [widgets] Storage keys and ECMAScript incompatibility? Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: [widgets] Storage keys and ECMAScript incompatibility? timeless
• [widgets] Storage keys and ECMAScript incompatibility? Scott Wilson
• Re: [Bug 11375] New: [IndexedDB] Error codes need to be assigned new numbers Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [Bug 11553] New: Ensure indexedDBSync is on the right worker interface Jeremy Orlow
• Re: W3C XML Digital Signature Object Element Processing Issue Andreas Kuehne
• W3C XML Digital Signature Object Element Processing Issue deepak
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Boris Zbarsky
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [IndexedDB] versionchange event gone? Jonas Sicking
• Re: [Bug 11375] New: [IndexedDB] Error codes need to be assigned new numbers Jonas Sicking
• [IndexedDB] versionchange event gone? Pablo Castro
• [Bug 11553] New: Ensure indexedDBSync is on the right worker interface bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Tab Atkins Jr.
• RE: [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)? Pablo Castro
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [Bug 11375] New: [IndexedDB] Error codes need to be assigned new numbers Shawn Wilsher
• Re: [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)? Jeremy Orlow
• RE: [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)? Pablo Castro
• Re: [Bug 11375] New: [IndexedDB] Error codes need to be assigned new numbers Jeremy Orlow
• RE: [Bug 11375] New: [IndexedDB] Error codes need to be assigned new numbers Pablo Castro

Tuesday, 14 December 2010

• Re: Rename XBL2 to something without X, B, or L? Olli Pettay
• Re: Rename XBL2 to something without X, B, or L? Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Rename XBL2 to something without X, B, or L? Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
• Rename XBL2 to something without X, B, or L? Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: [Bug 11398] New: [IndexedDB] Methods that take multiple optional parameters should instead take an options object Jeremy Orlow
• [Bug 11552] New: We should remove timeout from IndexedDB. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [Bug 11398] New: [IndexedDB] Methods that take multiple optional parameters should instead take an options object Jonas Sicking
• Re: [Bug 11398] New: [IndexedDB] Methods that take multiple optional parameters should instead take an options object Jeremy Orlow
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: [Bug 11398] New: [IndexedDB] Methods that take multiple optional parameters should instead take an options object Jonas Sicking
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Boris Zbarsky
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Boris Zbarsky
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Boris Zbarsky
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: Call for Editors for Server-sent Events, Web Storage, and Web Workers Arthur Barstow
• Re: [Bug 11398] New: [IndexedDB] Methods that take multiple optional parameters should instead take an options object Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [Bug 11398] New: [IndexedDB] Methods that take multiple optional parameters should instead take an options object Jeremy Orlow
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Robert O'Callahan
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Call for Editors for Server-sent Events, Web Storage, and Web Workers Ian Hickson
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Robert O'Callahan
• Re: Call for Editors for Server-sent Events, Web Storage, and Web Workers Ian Hickson

Monday, 13 December 2010

• Re: Call for Editors for Server-sent Events, Web Storage, and Web Workers Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Call for Editors for Server-sent Events, Web Storage, and Web Workers Doug Schepers
• Re: Call for Editors for Server-sent Events, Web Storage, and Web Workers Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Call for Editors for Server-sent Events, Web Storage, and Web Workers Doug Schepers
• Re: Call for Editors for Server-sent Events, Web Storage, and Web Workers Ian Hickson
• Re: Call for Editors for Server-sent Events, Web Storage, and Web Workers Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Call for Editors for Server-sent Events, Web Storage, and Web Workers Doug Schepers
• Re: Call for Editors for Server-sent Events, Web Storage, and Web Workers Ian Hickson
• Call for Editors for Server-sent Events, Web Storage, and Web Workers Doug Schepers

Sunday, 12 December 2010

• Re: using BlobBuilder append method with generated binary data Boris Zbarsky
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: using BlobBuilder append method with generated binary data Toni Ruottu
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Robert O'Callahan

Saturday, 11 December 2010

• Re: Local Storage Not Retaining Data Between Local Browser Sessions Adam Barth
• XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: ISSUE-173 (ericu): terminal FileWriter progress events should be queued [File API: Writer] Jonas Sicking

Friday, 10 December 2010

• RE: [Bug 11398] New: [IndexedDB] Methods that take multiple optional parameters should instead take an options object Pablo Castro
• Re: ISSUE-173 (ericu): terminal FileWriter progress events should be queued [File API: Writer] Eric Uhrhane
• Re: ISSUE-173 (ericu): terminal FileWriter progress events should be queued [File API: Writer] James Robinson
• Re: [Bug 11406] New: [IndexedDB] IDBDatabase.transaction needs to specify exception for invalid mode parameter Cameron McCormack
• Re: [Bug 11406] New: [IndexedDB] IDBDatabase.transaction needs to specify exception for invalid mode parameter Jonas Sicking
• Re: ISSUE-173 (ericu): terminal FileWriter progress events should be queued [File API: Writer] Eric Uhrhane
• Re: [Bug 11406] New: [IndexedDB] IDBDatabase.transaction needs to specify exception for invalid mode parameter Cameron McCormack
• Re: [Bug 11406] New: [IndexedDB] IDBDatabase.transaction needs to specify exception for invalid mode parameter Jonas Sicking
• Re: [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)? Jonas Sicking
• Re: [Bug 11394] New: We should throw if continue() is called with a key <= the current position Jonas Sicking
• Re: [IndexedDB] Events and requests Jonas Sicking
• Re: [Bug 11375] New: [IndexedDB] Error codes need to be assigned new numbers Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [Bug 11398] New: [IndexedDB] Methods that take multiple optional parameters should instead take an options object Shawn Wilsher
• Re: [Bug 11375] New: [IndexedDB] Error codes need to be assigned new numbers Shawn Wilsher
• [Bug 11530] No transaction should start until after all others that were created first and whose scope overlaps bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 11530] New: No transaction should start until after all others that were created first and whose scope overlaps bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 11527] Remove dynamic transactions from the spec bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 11528] New: We should add some form of dynamic transaction to IndexedDB bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 11527] New: Remove dynamic transactions from the spec bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [Bug 11406] New: [IndexedDB] IDBDatabase.transaction needs to specify exception for invalid mode parameter Jeremy Orlow
• [Bug 11349] [IndexedDB] Null should not be a valid key type bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)? Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [Bug 11398] New: [IndexedDB] Methods that take multiple optional parameters should instead take an options object Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [Bug 11394] New: We should throw if continue() is called with a key <= the current position Jeremy Orlow
• [Bug 11389] IDBTransaction.READ_ONLY should probably be 0 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [Bug 11375] New: [IndexedDB] Error codes need to be assigned new numbers Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [IndexedDB] Compound and multiple keys Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [IndexedDB] Events and requests Jeremy Orlow
• [Bug 9769] IDBObjectStoreRequest/Sync.put should be split into 3 methods bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10303] Transactions should not commit if code unwinds because of an exception bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10590] [IndexedDB] Default timeout duration needs to be specced bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 11407] [IndexedDB] IDBDatabase.createObjectStore: autoIncrement should not default to true bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: ISSUE-173 (ericu): terminal FileWriter progress events should be queued [File API: Writer] Anne van Kesteren
• ISSUE-173 (ericu): terminal FileWriter progress events should be queued [File API: Writer] Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker

Thursday, 9 December 2010

• Re: A URL API Adam Barth
• Re: [widgets] Some possible i18n test bugs Marcos Caceres

Tuesday, 7 December 2010

• PIPP network protocol jguerin@shootingsoul.com

Wednesday, 8 December 2010

• [widgets] Some possible i18n test bugs Scott Wilson

Tuesday, 7 December 2010

• Re: A URL API Jonas Sicking
• Re: continue as a reserved word and a conflict with IndexedDB Darin Adler

Monday, 6 December 2010

• Re: continue as a reserved word and a conflict with IndexedDB Patrick Mueller
• Typo in http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets-apis/ Section 5.1.1 Mike Taylor
• Re: using BlobBuilder append method with generated binary data Charles Pritchard
• Re: Seeking status of Server-sent Events, Web Storage and Web Workers Charles Pritchard
• Re: [File API] abort() Arun Ranganathan
• Re: Seeking status of Server-sent Events, Web Storage and Web Workers Ian Hickson
• Re: Seeking status of Server-sent Events, Web Storage and Web Workers Ian Hickson
• Re: using BlobBuilder append method with generated binary data Paul Kinlan
• Re: using BlobBuilder append method with generated binary data Toni Ruottu
• Re: continue as a reserved word and a conflict with IndexedDB Charles Pritchard
• [eventsource] Some data re Server-sent Events LC Arthur Barstow
• Re: Seeking status of Server-sent Events, Web Storage and Web Workers Arthur Barstow
• Re: continue as a reserved word and a conflict with IndexedDB Oliver Hunt
• Re: [File API] abort() Anne van Kesteren
• Re: continue as a reserved word and a conflict with IndexedDB Jeremy Orlow
• continue as a reserved word and a conflict with IndexedDB Charles Pritchard

Sunday, 5 December 2010

• Re: Structured clone in WebStorage Jeremy Orlow
• Re: Structured clone in WebStorage Jeremy Orlow

Saturday, 4 December 2010

• Re: Structured clone in WebStorage João Eiras

Friday, 3 December 2010

• Re: Structured clone in WebStorage Ian Hickson
• Re: using BlobBuilder append method with generated binary data Paul Kinlan
• Re: Structured clone in WebStorage Oliver Hunt
• Re: Structured clone in WebStorage Darin Fisher
• Re: Structured clone in WebStorage Darin Fisher
• Re: [widgets] Error in i18n tests for features Scott Wilson
• Re: [widgets] Error in i18n tests for features Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] Error in i18n tests for features Scott Wilson
• Re: [widgets] Error in i18n tests for features Marcos Caceres
• Re: [File API] abort() Arun Ranganathan
• Re: [widgets] Test widget has wrong content Marcos Caceres
• [widgets] Test widget has wrong content Scott Wilson
• [widgets] Error in i18n tests for features Scott Wilson
• Re: [widgets] Error in test case "bm" Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] test "bn" in error Marcos Caceres

Thursday, 2 December 2010

• Re: Structured clone in WebStorage Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Structured clone in WebStorage Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Structured clone in WebStorage Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Structured clone in WebStorage Jeremy Orlow
• Re: Structured clone in WebStorage Jonas Sicking
• Re: Issue in DIgital Signature test suite Marcos Caceres
• Re: Structured clone in WebStorage Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Structured clone in WebStorage Jeremy Orlow
• Re: Structured clone in WebStorage Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: using BlobBuilder append method with generated binary data Toni Ruottu
• Re: Structured clone in WebStorage Arthur Barstow
• Re: [IndexedDB] Compound and multiple keys Keean Schupke
• Issue in DIgital Signature test suite viji
• Re: [IndexedDB] Compound and multiple keys Tab Atkins Jr.
• [IndexedDB] Compound and multiple keys Jonas Sicking

Wednesday, 1 December 2010

• [widgets] WARP test bugs Scott Wilson
• [widgets] test "viewh" in error Scott Wilson
• [widgets] test "bn" in error Scott Wilson
• [widgets] Error in test case "bm" Scott Wilson
• [widgets] missing tests? Scott Wilson
• [widgets] test "dl" is in error Scott Wilson
• Re: FileSystem API: Avoiding Upload Forms And Temporary Downloads Eric Uhrhane

Tuesday, 30 November 2010

• Re: Embedding WebSocket Servers in Web Pages Toni Ruottu
• Re: Embedding WebSocket Servers in Web Pages Nathan
• Embedding WebSocket Servers in Web Pages Toni Ruottu
• Re: [XHR2] responseType / response / overrideMimeType proposal Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Fwd: CfC: Last Call Working Draft of Progress Events; deadline Nov 29 Anne van Kesteren
• [Bug 11439] New: Extend ProgressEvent with position and totalSize attributes bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Monday, 29 November 2010

• Re: [XHR2] responseType / response / overrideMimeType proposal Chris Rogers
• Re: [XHR2] responseType / response / overrideMimeType proposal Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: [XHR2] responseType / response / overrideMimeType proposal Chris Rogers
• Re: [XHR2] responseType / response / overrideMimeType proposal Chris Rogers
• FileSystem API: Avoiding Upload Forms And Temporary Downloads Joran Greef
• Re: Local Storage Not Retaining Data Between Local Browser Sessions Jonas Sicking
• Re: Local Storage Not Retaining Data Between Local Browser Sessions Adam Barth
• Re: Seeking status of Server-sent Events, Web Storage and Web Workers Ian Hickson
• Re: [XHR2] responseType / response / overrideMimeType proposal Jonas Sicking
• Re: [XHR2] responseType / response / overrideMimeType proposal James Robinson
• [XHR2] responseType / response / overrideMimeType proposal Anne van Kesteren
• RE: Structured clone in WebStorage Adrian Bateman
• [Bug 11425] New: [IndexedDB] Transaction timeout parameter should probably be a double bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [File API] abort() Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Local Storage Not Retaining Data Between Local Browser Sessions Jonas Sicking
• Re: Local Storage Not Retaining Data Between Local Browser Sessions Rob Crowther

Sunday, 28 November 2010

• Re: requestAnimationFrame Doug Schepers
• Local Storage Not Retaining Data Between Local Browser Sessions Ronald Lane
• [Bug 11419] New: Local Storage Data Not Retained Between Sessions When Running Browser Locally bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Saturday, 27 November 2010

• [Embedding] running widgets in a regular web page ??? Scott Wilson

Friday, 26 November 2010

• Re: [Widgets] running widgets in a regular web page ??? Peter Dekkers
• Re: [Widgets] running widgets in a regular web page ??? Marcos Caceres
• Re: [Widgets] running widgets in a regular web page ??? Scott Wilson
• Widget Embedding [was: Re: [widgets] running widgets in a regular web page ???] Arthur Barstow
• Re: [Widgets] running widgets in a regular web page ??? Nathan
• [Widgets] running widgets in a regular web page ??? Peter Dekkers

Thursday, 25 November 2010

• [Bug 11407] New: [IndexedDB] IDBDatabase.createObjectStore: autoIncrement should not default to true bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [widgets] removed test-cases/ta-ZjcdAxFMSx/002/ Marcos Caceres
• Re: progress events in sync XHR not entirely ruled out Anne van Kesteren
• [Bug 11406] New: [IndexedDB] IDBDatabase.transaction needs to specify exception for invalid mode parameter bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Wednesday, 24 November 2010

• [widgets] Icon i18n width/height tests Marcos Caceres
• [Bug 11401] New: [IndexedDB] We should disallow .transaction() from within setVersion transactions bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• progress events in sync XHR not entirely ruled out Eric Uhrhane
• [Bug 11398] New: [IndexedDB] Methods that take multiple optional parameters should instead take an options object bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [widgets] Removed test-cases/ta-xGYcVTMoAX/000/ds.wgt Marcos Caceres
• [Widgets] Default values in P&C Marcos Caceres
• Structured clone in WebStorage Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [cors] 27 July 2010 CORS feedback Jonas Sicking
• [Bug 11396] New: Add a callback to IDBDatabaseSync.transaction bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [cors] 27 July 2010 CORS feedback Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [cors] 27 July 2010 CORS feedback Jonas Sicking
• Re: [cors] 27 July 2010 CORS feedback Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [ProgressEvents] How to deal with compressed transfer encodings Boris Zbarsky
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [ProgressEvents] How to deal with compressed transfer encodings Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [ProgressEvents] How to deal with compressed transfer encodings Bjoern Hoehrmann

Tuesday, 23 November 2010

• [Bug 11394] New: We should throw if continue() is called with a key <= the current position bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: CORS & ISSUE-108 Dirk Pranke
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Robert O'Callahan
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Gregg Tavares (wrk)
• Re: CORS & ISSUE-108 Tyler Close
• Re: [ProgressEvents] How to deal with compressed transfer encodings Anne van Kesteren
• [ProgressEvents] How to deal with compressed transfer encodings Jonas Sicking
• [widgets] VMMF Test suite Marcos Caceres
• Seeking status of Server-sent Events, Web Storage and Web Workers Arthur Barstow
• [Bug 11389] New: IDBTransaction.READ_ONLY should probably be 0 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 11385] New: Bring the sync APIs back in sync with the async ones bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Monday, 22 November 2010

• Re: [cors] 27 July 2010 CORS feedback Mark Nottingham
• Re: [cors] 27 July 2010 CORS feedback Jonas Sicking
• Re: [cors] 27 July 2010 CORS feedback Jonas Sicking
• [Bug 11376] New: IDBObjectStore.put's DATA_ERR description needs clarification bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10302] Introduce exception handlers at the transaction/database scope bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [cors] 27 July 2010 CORS feedback Boris Zbarsky
• [Bug 11375] New: [IndexedDB] Error codes need to be assigned new numbers bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)? Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [cors] 27 July 2010 CORS feedback Keean Schupke
• Re: [cors] 27 July 2010 CORS feedback Julian Reschke
• Re: [cors] 27 July 2010 CORS feedback Keean Schupke
• Re: [cors] 27 July 2010 CORS feedback Mark Nottingham
• Re: [cors] 27 July 2010 CORS feedback Jonas Sicking
• Re: [cors] 27 July 2010 CORS feedback Mark Nottingham
• Re: [cors] 27 July 2010 CORS feedback Jonas Sicking
• [cors] 27 July 2010 CORS feedback Mark Nottingham

Saturday, 20 November 2010

• Re: [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)? Jonas Sicking
• [Bug 11358] New: Should addEventListener's last argument be optional? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)? Keean Schupke
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Robert O'Callahan
• Re: [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)? Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)? Jonas Sicking
• Re: [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)? Bjoern Hoehrmann
• RE: [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)? Pablo Castro
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Bjoern Hoehrmann

Friday, 19 November 2010

• Re: requestAnimationFrame Ojan Vafai
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Cameron McCormack
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Cameron McCormack
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Darin Fisher
• Last Call of WOFF File Format 1.0; comment deadline December 14 Arthur Barstow
• Re: [Bug 11350] New: [IndexedDB] ObjectStores should have a way to hint that they're "evictable" Jeremy Orlow
• [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 11350] New: [IndexedDB] ObjectStores should have a way to hint that they're "evictable" bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 11349] New: [IndexedDB] Null should not be a valid key type bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Robert O'Callahan
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Robert O'Callahan

Thursday, 18 November 2010

• Re: revokeObjectURL behavior Michael Nordman
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Gregg Tavares (wrk)
• Re: revokeObjectURL behavior Jonas Sicking
• Re: revokeObjectURL behavior Michael Nordman
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Robert O'Callahan
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Robert O'Callahan
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Robert O'Callahan
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Darin Fisher
• Seeking feedback on Widget Interface: LocalizableString Arthur Barstow
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Gregg Tavares (wrk)
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon Arun Ranganathan
• Re: revokeObjectURL behavior Arun Ranganathan
• Re: Request for Last Call review of RDFa Core 1.1; deadline Arthur Barstow
• Request for Last Call review of RDFa Core 1.1 Manu Sporny
• [widgets] Draft minutes for 18 November 2010 voice conf Arthur Barstow
• Re: [widgets] Draft agenda for 18 November 2010 voice conf timeless
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Robert O'Callahan
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Boris Zbarsky
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Gregg Tavares (wrk)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame James Robinson
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Boris Zbarsky
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Robert O'Callahan
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Robert O'Callahan

Wednesday, 17 November 2010

• Re: requestAnimationFrame Cameron McCormack
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Gregg Tavares (wrk)
• Re: revokeObjectURL behavior Jonas Sicking
• Re: revokeObjectURL behavior Anne van Kesteren
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Gregg Tavares (wrk)
• Re: revokeObjectURL behavior Jonas Sicking
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators Jonas Sicking
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators Jeremy Orlow
• CORS & ISSUE-108 Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [CORS] Access-Control-Expose-Headers Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [CORS] Multiple origin values? Anne van Kesteren
• [widgets] Draft agenda for 18 November 2010 voice conf Arthur Barstow
• Re: revokeObjectURL behavior Anne van Kesteren
• RE: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon Adrian Bateman

Tuesday, 16 November 2010

• Re: revokeObjectURL behavior Jian Li
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon Dmitry Titov
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Robert O'Callahan
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon Jonas Sicking
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon Jonas Sicking
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon Dmitry Titov
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon Michael Nordman
• revokeObjectURL behavior Jonas Sicking
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Boris Zbarsky
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Gregg Tavares (wrk)
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon Dmitry Titov
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon Jonas Sicking
• Re: using BlobBuilder append method with generated binary data Toni Ruottu
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon Anne van Kesteren
• Testing Requirements Anne van Kesteren
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Jonas Sicking
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Robert O'Callahan
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Robert O'Callahan
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Boris Zbarsky
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Boris Zbarsky
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Gregg Tavares (wrk)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Jonas Sicking
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Gregg Tavares (wrk)
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon Jonas Sicking
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Gregg Tavares (wrk)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Jonas Sicking
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Robert O'Callahan

Monday, 15 November 2010

• Re: requestAnimationFrame Robert O'Callahan
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Gregg Tavares (wrk)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame Boris Zbarsky
• requestAnimationFrame Gregg Tavares (wrk)
• Re: Updates to FileAPI Eric Uhrhane
• [widgets] Widget Updates Rich Tibbett
• CfC: Last Call Working Draft of Progress Events; deadline Nov 29 Arthur Barstow
• Re: [DataCache] Status and plans for Programmable HTTP Caching and Serving? Mark Nottingham
• Re: Updates to FileAPI Jian Li

Sunday, 14 November 2010

• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon Cameron McCormack

Saturday, 13 November 2010

• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon Jonas Sicking
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators Keean Schupke
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators Keean Schupke
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators Jonas Sicking
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators Keean Schupke
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon Jonas Sicking
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon Jonas Sicking
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon Tab Atkins Jr.

Friday, 12 November 2010

• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon Jonas Sicking
• RE: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon Adrian Bateman
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [Bug 11280] New: IDBFactory.databases doesn't work Jonas Sicking
• [Bug 11280] IDBFactory.databases doesn't work bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [Bug 11257] New: Should IDBCursor.update be able to create a new entry? Jonas Sicking
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators Jonas Sicking
• Re: Updates to FileAPI Arun Ranganathan
• Re: FileAPI editorial nit Arun Ranganathan
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist Jonas Sicking
• Re: CfC: FPWD of Web Messaging; deadline November 13 Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: CfC: FPWD of Web Messaging; deadline November 13 Jonas Sicking
• Re: Updates to FileAPI Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Updates to FileAPI Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Updates to FileAPI Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Updates to FileAPI Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist Keean Schupke
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [Bug 11257] New: Should IDBCursor.update be able to create a new entry? Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators Keean Schupke
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators Keean Schupke
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators Jonas Sicking
• Re: [Bug 11257] New: Should IDBCursor.update be able to create a new entry? Jonas Sicking
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [IndexedDB] .value of no-duplicate cursors Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [Bug 11257] New: Should IDBCursor.update be able to create a new entry? Jeremy Orlow

Thursday, 11 November 2010

• Re: Relational Data Model Example Keean Schupke
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators Jonas Sicking
• Re: [IndexedDB] .value of no-duplicate cursors Jonas Sicking
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon Jonas Sicking
• Re: [Bug 11257] New: Should IDBCursor.update be able to create a new entry? Jonas Sicking
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon Arun Ranganathan
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist Jonas Sicking
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon Arthur Barstow
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist Shawn Wilsher
• Re: [Bug 11257] New: Should IDBCursor.update be able to create a new entry? Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [IndexedDB] .value of no-duplicate cursors Jeremy Orlow
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon Jonas Sicking
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators Jeremy Orlow
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon Eric Uhrhane
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon Eric Uhrhane
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon Jonas Sicking
• Re: CfC: FPWD of Web Messaging; deadline November 13 Ian Hickson
• Re: [Bug 11257] New: Should IDBCursor.update be able to create a new entry? Jonas Sicking
• Re: Relational Data Model Example Jonas Sicking
• FileAPI editorial nit Julian Reschke
• Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon Arun Ranganathan
• Re: Updates to FileAPI Arun Ranganathan
• Re: Comments on the http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/ Marcos Caceres
• Re: [IndexedDB] .value of no-duplicate cursors ben turner
• Re: [IndexedDB] .value of no-duplicate cursors Jonas Sicking
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist Jonas Sicking
• Re: Updates to FileAPI Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators Tab Atkins Jr.
• [widgets] Tiny bug in spec in section 9.1.16 Marcos Caceres
• Re: Relational Data Model Example Keean Schupke
• Re: [Bug 11269] New: Evaluating keyPaths needs to be better specified Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [Bug 11257] New: Should IDBCursor.update be able to create a new entry? Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators Keean Schupke
• Re: CfC: FPWD of Web Messaging; deadline November 13 Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: [IndexedDB] .value of no-duplicate cursors Jeremy Orlow
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Simon Pieters
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators Jeremy Orlow
• Re: CfC: FPWD of Web Messaging; deadline November 13 Arthur Barstow
• Re: [Bug 11280] New: IDBFactory.databases doesn't work Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [IndexedDB] Events and requests Jeremy Orlow
• [Bug 10527] [IndexedDB] Result of IDBCursor.remove and update unspecified. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Updates to FileAPI Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Updates to FileAPI Arun Ranganathan
• Re: Updates to FileAPI Eric Uhrhane
• Re: Updates to FileAPI Jian Li
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Boris Zbarsky
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" David Flanagan

Wednesday, 10 November 2010

• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators Jonas Sicking
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators Jonas Sicking
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Tab Atkins Jr.
• RE: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators Pablo Castro
• Re: Making non-cookie requests to another domain... possible DoS attack by forcing session expiration? Jonas Sicking
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators Keean Schupke
• Re: Making non-cookie requests to another domain... possible DoS attack by forcing session expiration? Getify
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators ben turner
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators Jonas Sicking
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Chris Rogers
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Jonas Sicking
• RE: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators Pablo Castro
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators Tab Atkins Jr.
• RE: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators Pablo Castro
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Chris Rogers
• Re: Making non-cookie requests to another domain... possible DoS attack by forcing session expiration? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Michael Nordman
• Re: Making non-cookie requests to another domain... possible DoS attack by forcing session expiration? Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Making non-cookie requests to another domain... possible DoS attack by forcing session expiration? Jonas Sicking
• Making non-cookie requests to another domain... possible DoS attack by forcing session expiration? Getify
• Re: [IndexedDB] Events and requests Jonas Sicking
• Re: [IndexedDB] Events and requests Shawn Wilsher
• Re: CfC: to publish Web SQL Database as a Working Group Note; deadline November 13 Ian Hickson
• Re: CfC: to publish Web SQL Database as a Working Group Note; deadline November 13 Arthur Barstow
• Re: Comments on the http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/ Marcos Caceres
• [widgets] No call November 11 Arthur Barstow
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [IndexedDB] Need a method to remove a database Jonas Sicking

Tuesday, 9 November 2010

• [Bug 11276] Specify deleteDatabase bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 11280] New: IDBFactory.databases doesn't work bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" David Flanagan
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Boris Zbarsky
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Jonas Sicking
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Chris Rogers
• [Bug 11276] New: Specify deleteDatabase bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: CfC: to publish Web SQL Database as a Working Group Note; deadline November 13 Jonas Sicking
• Re: CfC: to publish Web SQL Database as a Working Group Note; deadline November 13 Nikunj Mehta
• Relational Data Model Example Keean Schupke
• RE: FPWD of Web Messaging; deadline November 13 Adrian Bateman
• RE: to publish Web SQL Database as a Working Group Note; deadline November 13 Adrian Bateman
• Re: Comments on the http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/ viji
• [IndexedDB] Events and requests Jonas Sicking
• [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist Jonas Sicking
• [Bug 11269] New: Evaluating keyPaths needs to be better specified bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist Keean Schupke
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist Jonas Sicking
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist Keean Schupke

Monday, 8 November 2010

• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist Jonas Sicking
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist Kris Zyp
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist Keean Schupke
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist Jonas Sicking
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist Kris Zyp
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist Keean Schupke
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist Jonas Sicking
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist Keean Schupke
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist Jonas Sicking
• Re: [IndexedDB] Need a method to clear an object store Jonas Sicking
• [Bug 11266] Add IDBObjectStore.clear() bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist Keean Schupke
• [Bug 11266] New: Add IDBObjectStore.clear() bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [IndexedDB] .value of no-duplicate cursors Jonas Sicking
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist Jonas Sicking
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist Keean Schupke
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist Jonas Sicking
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist Keean Schupke
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist Keean Schupke
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist Jonas Sicking
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist Keean Schupke
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist Keean Schupke
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist Jonas Sicking
• [Bug 9882] Behavior when attempting to write data to an objectStore opened as read only unspecified bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist Keean Schupke
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist Tab Atkins Jr.
• [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist Jonas Sicking
• [Bug 10402] [IndexedDB] IDBCursor.remove/update behavior when at end of range unspecified bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 11246] Remove IDBCursor(Sync).count bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10088] The spec does not define what happens if an object store is modified while a cursor is iterating it. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10430] [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 11187] [IndexedDB] Repeated calls to IDBCursor.continue() should throw bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 11094] [IndexedDB] IDBIndex.get* don't define which item is returned in the case of duplicates bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10058] Specify order for indexes which contain duplicate key values bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 11257] New: Should IDBCursor.update be able to create a new entry? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Sunday, 7 November 2010

• Re: Widget packaging spec: make it clear in the Abstract or Intro that P&C widgets != UI controls Marcos Caceres
• Re: Widget packaging spec: make it clear in the Abstract or Intro that P&C widgets != UI controls timeless
• Widget packaging spec: make it clear in the Abstract or Intro that P&C widgets != UI controls Arthur Barstow
• Re: CfC: FPWD of Web Messaging; deadline November 13 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: CfC: FPWD of Web Messaging; deadline November 13 Maciej Stachowiak

Saturday, 6 November 2010

• Re: CfC: to publish Web SQL Database as a Working Group Note; deadline November 13 Ian Hickson
• Re: CfC: FPWD of Web Messaging; deadline November 13 Ian Hickson
• CfC: to publish Web SQL Database as a Working Group Note; deadline November 13 Arthur Barstow
• CfC: FPWD of Web Messaging; deadline November 13 Arthur Barstow
• [Bug 11246] New: Remove IDBCursor(Sync).count bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Friday, 5 November 2010

• Re: [DataCache] Status and plans for Programmable HTTP Caching and Serving? Michael Nordman
• [DataCache] Status and plans for Programmable HTTP Caching and Serving? Arthur Barstow
• Re: Minutes from WebApps' 2 November 2010 meeting Eric Uhrhane

Thursday, 4 November 2010

• Re: [Bug 10430] New: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior Ian Hickson
• Re: IndexedDB TPAC agenda Nikunj Mehta
• Re: [Bug 10430] New: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior Jonas Sicking
• Re: IndexedDB TPAC agenda Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [Bug 10430] New: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior Jeremy Orlow
• Re: IndexedDB TPAC agenda Jonas Sicking
• Re: [Bug 10430] New: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior Jonas Sicking
• Re: IndexedDB TPAC agenda Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [Bug 10430] New: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [Bug 10430] New: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior Jonas Sicking

Wednesday, 3 November 2010

• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" David Flanagan
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Boris Zbarsky
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Boris Zbarsky
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Jonas Sicking
• Minutes from WebApps' 2 November 2010 meeting Arthur Barstow
• Notes from WebApps' 1 November 2010 "Gathering" Arthur Barstow
• Re: Comments on the http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/ viji
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Boris Zbarsky
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Jonas Sicking
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Boris Zbarsky

Tuesday, 2 November 2010

• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Chris Rogers
• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. Cameron McCormack
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" David Flanagan
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" James Robinson
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" David Flanagan
• Re: IndexedDB TPAC agenda Jeremy Orlow
• Re: Comments on the http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/ Marcos Caceres
• Re: IndexedDB TPAC agenda Nikunj Mehta
• Re: IndexedDB TPAC agenda Nathan Kitchen
• Re: IndexedDB TPAC agenda Jonas Sicking
• Re: IndexedDB TPAC agenda Jeremy Orlow
• RE: IndexedDB TPAC agenda Pablo Castro
• Re: Comments on the http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/ viji

Monday, 1 November 2010

• Re: Widgets and OAuth or other similar redirect-based protocols Jean-Yves Bitterlich

Tuesday, 2 November 2010

• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. Garrett Smith
• Re: [IndexedDB] IDBKeyRange cleanup Cameron McCormack
• Re: Questions about API Design, composability and multiple arguments Cameron McCormack

Monday, 1 November 2010

• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Chris Marrin
• RE: IndexedDB TPAC agenda Pablo Castro
• [Bug 11190] New: Make scripts created by createContextualFragment() executable bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Boris Zbarsky
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Jonas Sicking
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Jonas Sicking
• Re: [IndexedDB] IDBKeyRange cleanup Jonas Sicking
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Olli Pettay
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Chris Marrin
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Olli Pettay
• Re: Comment on Widget Interface... Marcos Caceres
• Re: Comments on the http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/ Marcos Caceres
• Re: ACTION-591: Checkin updates for issues 150 and 151 (Web Applications Working Group) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [Widgets] and OAuth or other similar redirect-based protocols Scott Wilson
• Re: [IndexedDB] IDBKeyRange cleanup Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [Bug 10430] New: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior Shawn Wilsher
• Widgets and OAuth or other similar redirect-based protocols Bryan Sullivan
• Re: IndexedDB TPAC agenda Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [Bug 10430] New: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior Jeremy Orlow
• Re: IndexedDB TPAC agenda Jonas Sicking
• Re: IndexedDB TPAC agenda Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [Bug 10430] New: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior Jonas Sicking
• Re: IndexedDB TPAC agenda Jonas Sicking
• [Bug 11187] New: [IndexedDB] Repeated calls to IDBCursor.continue() should throw bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [Bug 10430] New: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior Jeremy Orlow
• IndexedDB TPAC agenda Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [Bug 10430] New: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior Jonas Sicking
• [Workers] NavigatorOnLine Olli Pettay
• Re: [Bug 10430] New: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [Bug 10430] New: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior Jonas Sicking
• Re: [Bug 10430] New: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [Bug 10430] New: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior Jonas Sicking
• Re: [Bug 10430] New: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior Jeremy Orlow
• [Bug 10431] [IndexedDB] Remove IDBDatabase.objectStore() bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 9790] Request is not a good suffix for all the async interfaces in IndexedDB bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Sunday, 31 October 2010

• Re: Feedback requested on returning null/void or throwing an exception Cameron McCormack
• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. Cameron McCormack
• Re: [XHR2] HTTP Trailers Julian Reschke
• Re: [XHR2] HTTP Trailers Maciej Stachowiak

Saturday, 30 October 2010

• Questions about API Design, composability and multiple arguments Nathan
• Re: [XHR2] HTTP Trailers Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [XHR2] HTTP Trailers Julian Reschke
• Re: [XHR2] HTTP Trailers Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [XHR2] HTTP Trailers Anne van Kesteren
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Jonas Sicking
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Boris Zbarsky
• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. Garrett Smith
• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. Cameron McCormack

Friday, 29 October 2010

• Re: [IndexedDB] IDBKeyRange cleanup Jonas Sicking
• [Bug 10397] [IndexedDB] "upper" and "lower" bounds would be much clearer than right/left bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10396] [IndexedDB] LEFT_BOUND and RIGHT_BOUND could be a bit more clear bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10007] Async callbacks should fire in the same order the async requests are made in IndexedDB. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10765] [IndexedDB] Need to add an onblocked event to what's returned from setVersion bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 9562] Opening a database with a different description is underspecified bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10305] [IndexedDB] Transactions need to be clarified bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [Bug 11164] New: There is no way to get from an error event to other objectStores Jonas Sicking
• Re: [Bug 11164] New: There is no way to get from an error event to other objectStores Shawn Wilsher
• Re: [XHR2] why have an asBlob attribute at all? David Flanagan
• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XHR2] why have an asBlob attribute at all? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: XHR: Unicode signature stripping Anne van Kesteren
• Agendas for WebApps' Nov 1-2 f2f meeting Arthur Barstow
• Re: [XHR2] why have an asBlob attribute at all? Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: [XHR2] why have an asBlob attribute at all? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XHR2] why have an asBlob attribute at all? David Flanagan
• [Bug 11164] New: There is no way to get from an error event to other objectStores bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Boris Zbarsky
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" James Robinson
• Re: Feedback requested on returning null/void or throwing an exception Nathan
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Boris Zbarsky
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Jonas Sicking
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [XHR2] why have an asBlob attribute at all? Boris Zbarsky
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" James Robinson

Thursday, 28 October 2010

• Re: Feedback requested on returning null/void or throwing an exception Cameron McCormack
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Chris Rogers
• [XHR2] why have an asBlob attribute at all? David Flanagan
• Feedback requested on returning null/void or throwing an exception Nathan
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Maciej Stachowiak
• [Bug 11157] carasen bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 11157] New: carasen bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10609] DOMTimeStamp should be defined in Web IDL bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10597] Array type missing from IDL grammar bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10336] "optional" should be allowed even if subsequent arguments aren't optional bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Boris Zbarsky
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Maciej Stachowiak

Wednesday, 27 October 2010

• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Geoffrey Garen
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Boris Zbarsky
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Michael Nordman
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Boris Zbarsky
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Boris Zbarsky
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Michael Nordman
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Geoffrey Garen
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Boris Zbarsky
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Chris Marrin
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Chris Marrin
• [Important] W3C Account Phishing Scam Ted Guild
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Jeremy Orlow
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Boris Zbarsky
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Jeremy Orlow
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Keean Schupke
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Keean Schupke
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Jeremy Orlow
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Keean Schupke
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Jeremy Orlow
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Jeremy Orlow
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Keean Schupke
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Nathan Kitchen
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Keean Schupke
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Jonas Sicking
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Keean Schupke
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Keean Schupke
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Nathan Kitchen
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Boris Zbarsky
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Boris Zbarsky
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Boris Zbarsky
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Darin Fisher
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Darin Fisher
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Boris Zbarsky
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Boris Zbarsky
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Darin Fisher
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Darin Fisher
• Attn: Account Subscriber Webmaster
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Boris Zbarsky
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Boris Zbarsky
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Boris Zbarsky
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Nathan

Tuesday, 26 October 2010

• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Chris Marrin
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Chris Marrin
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Michael Nordman
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Nathan
• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. Garrett Smith
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Chris Rogers
• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. Garrett Smith
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Keean Schupke
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Keean Schupke
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Keean Schupke
• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. Cameron McCormack
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Jeremy Orlow
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Keean Schupke
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Alexey Proskuryakov
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Nathan
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Keean Schupke
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Keean Schupke
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Jeremy Orlow
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Keean Schupke
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Jeremy Orlow
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Keean Schupke
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Julian Reschke
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Keean Schupke
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Jeremy Orlow
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Keean Schupke
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Arthur Barstow
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Jeremy Orlow
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Keean Schupke
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Jeremy Orlow
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Keean Schupke
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Keean Schupke
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Keean Schupke
• Re: XML base after redirection Julian Reschke
• Re: XML base after redirection Nathan
• Re: [XHR2] HTTP Trailers Julian Reschke
• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XHR2] overrideMimeType behavior Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XHR2] HTTP Trailers Mark Nottingham
• Re: [XHR2] HTTP Trailers Julian Reschke
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Jeremy Orlow
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Keean Schupke
• Re: [XHR2] HTTP Trailers Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Jeremy Orlow
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Keean Schupke
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Keean Schupke
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Jonas Sicking
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Keean Schupke
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Keean Schupke
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Mikeal Rogers
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Keean Schupke
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Keean Schupke
• Re: createBlobURL Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: createBlobURL Jonas Sicking
• Re: createBlobURL Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: createBlobURL Jonas Sicking
• Re: createBlobURL Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: createBlobURL Jonas Sicking
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Jonas Sicking
• Re: createBlobURL Tab Atkins Jr.

Monday, 25 October 2010

• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Boris Zbarsky
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Boris Zbarsky
• Re: createBlobURL Jonas Sicking
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Jeremy Orlow
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Boris Zbarsky
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Jeremy Orlow
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Chris Marrin
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Alexey Proskuryakov
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Boris Zbarsky
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Eric Uhrhane
• XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" Chris Rogers
• Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. Keean Schupke
• [Bug 10674] [IndexedDB] Changes to indexes (and their cursors) bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10765] [IndexedDB] Need to add an onblocked event to what's returned from setVersion bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10765] New: [IndexedDB] Need to add an onblocked event to what's returned from setVersion bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10027] Remove explicit add/remove functions from IDBIndex bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10426] [IndexedDB] All interfaces (except IDBEnvironment*) should not have NoInterfaceObject bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: createBlobURL Anne van Kesteren

Sunday, 24 October 2010

• Re: [IndexedDB] IDBKeyRange cleanup Jeremy Orlow

Saturday, 23 October 2010

• [IndexedDB] IDBKeyRange cleanup Jonas Sicking

Friday, 22 October 2010

• Re: Can we remove forminput and formchange events and related dispatch methods? Anne van Kesteren
• [Bug 10304] Rename "remove" method on object store to "delete" bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 11104] [IndexedDB] removeObjectStore/Index should be renamed to delete___ bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Can we remove forminput and formchange events and related dispatch methods? Erik Arvidsson
• Re: Can we remove forminput and formchange events and related dispatch methods? Jonas Sicking
• Re: Can we remove forminput and formchange events and related dispatch methods? Erik Arvidsson
• [Bug 11117] this is a test message bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: ISSUE-152: [widgets] P&C test suite needs a few more XML entity cases to check for well-formed XML Marcos Caceres
• [Bug 10584] toString does not represent what WebKit and Mozilla do, which is to return only the text within the selection that is visible to the user. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Use cases for Range::createContextualFragment and script nodes Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Can we remove forminput and formchange events and related dispatch methods? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Can we remove forminput and formchange events and related dispatch methods? Sergey Ilinsky
• [Bug 11117] New: this is a test message bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: DOM3 Events last call comment Charles McCathieNevile

Thursday, 21 October 2010

• Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18 Jonas Sicking
• Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18 Cameron McCormack
• Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18 Jonas Sicking
• Can we remove forminput and formchange events and related dispatch methods? Erik Arvidsson
• RE: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18 Travis Leithead
• Re: createBlobURL Jonas Sicking
• Re: createBlobURL Arun Ranganathan
• [Bug 11113] New: [IndexedDB] The spec should be more explicit about the queuing of setVersion transactions bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [widgets] Draft minutes from 21 October 2010 voice conf Arthur Barstow
• Re: [widgets] Draft agenda for 21 October 2010 voice conf Steven Pemberton
• Re: createBlobURL Anne van Kesteren
• Re: createBlobURL Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Use cases for Range::createContextualFragment and script nodes Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Use cases for Range::createContextualFragment and script nodes Olli Pettay
• Re: Use cases for Range::createContextualFragment and script nodes Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Use cases for Range::createContextualFragment and script nodes Adam Barth
• Re: [Widgets] Mozilla open apps Doug Schepers
• [XHR2] HTTP Trailers Mark Nottingham
• Re: ISSUE-2 (OnFoo Attributes): Event Handler Attributes (onfoo Attributes) and Add/Remove Event Listener [DOM3 Events] Garrett Smith

Wednesday, 20 October 2010

• Re: [Widgets] Mozilla open apps Scott Wilson
• Re: [Widgets] Mozilla open apps Marcos Caceres
• Re: [Widgets] Mozilla open apps Mike Hanson
• Re: [Widgets] Mozilla open apps Brandon Sterne
• Re: using BlobBuilder append method with generated binary data Eric Uhrhane
• Re: Use cases for Range::createContextualFragment and script nodes Stewart Brodie
• using BlobBuilder append method with generated binary data Toni Ruottu
• Use cases for Range::createContextualFragment and script nodes Henri Sivonen
• [widgets] Draft agenda for 21 October 2010 voice conf Arthur Barstow
• Re: [Widgets] Mozilla open apps Vivek Khurana
• Re: [Widgets] Mozilla open apps Olli Pettay
• Re: [Widgets] Mozilla open apps timeless
• [Widgets] Mozilla open apps Scott Wilson
• [Bug 11104] New: [IndexedDB] removeObjectStore/Index should be renamed to delete___ bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: createBlobURL Darin Fisher
• Re: createBlobURL Jonas Sicking
• Re: [IndexedDB] Should removeIndex/ObjectStore be renamed to match s/remove/delete/ elsewhere? Jonas Sicking
• Re: [IndexedDB] Should removeIndex/ObjectStore be renamed to match s/remove/delete/ elsewhere? Tab Atkins Jr.

Tuesday, 19 October 2010

• Re: createBlobURL Jonas Sicking
• [IndexedDB] Should removeIndex/ObjectStore be renamed to match s/remove/delete/ elsewhere? Jeremy Orlow
• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. Garrett Smith
• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. Scott Shattuck
• [Bug 11097] New: [IndexedDB] Behavior of .close() is not completely specified bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. Erik Arvidsson
• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. Garrett Smith
• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. Garrett Smith
• ISSUE-152: [widgets] P&C test suite needs a few more XML entity cases to check for well-formed XML Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-151: [widgets] P&C Spec.... If feature-name is not a valid IRI, and required-feature is true, then the user agent must treat this widget as an invalid widget package. but doesnt say anything about the case when it is not required. Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-150: [widgets] Email and param name and value as 'Keyword attributes' is causing confusion in Widgets P&C Spec Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: createBlobURL Arun Ranganathan
• [Bug 11094] New: [IndexedDB] IDBIndex.get* don't define which item is returned in the case of duplicates bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Comments on the http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/ viji
• [widgets] Reminder: RfC: LCWD of Widget Packaging and Configuration; comment deadline October 26 Arthur Barstow
• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. Anne van Kesteren
• Re: createBlobURL Anne van Kesteren
• Re: createBlobURL Anne van Kesteren
• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. Boris Zbarsky
• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. Garrett Smith
• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. Boris Zbarsky
• Re: createBlobURL Arun Ranganathan
• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. Oliver Hunt
• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. Cameron McCormack
• DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. Erik Arvidsson
• Re: createBlobURL Jonas Sicking
• Re: createBlobURL Michael Nordman

Monday, 18 October 2010

• Re: Updates to FileAPI Eric Uhrhane
• Re: Updates to FileAPI Arun Ranganathan
• Re: createBlobURL Arun Ranganathan
• Re: createBlobURL Jonas Sicking
• Re: CfC: WD of File API; deadline October 22 Eric Uhrhane
• Re: createBlobURL Anne van Kesteren
• Re: createBlobURL Jonas Sicking
• Re: createBlobURL Anne van Kesteren
• Re: createBlobURL Jonas Sicking
• Re: createBlobURL Anne van Kesteren
• Re: createBlobURL Arun Ranganathan
• createBlobURL (was: Re: CfC: WD of File API; deadline October 22) Anne van Kesteren
• CfC: WD of File API; deadline October 22 Arthur Barstow

Friday, 15 October 2010

• Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18 Sam Weinig
• Re: [progress-events] default action suggestion Anne van Kesteren
• Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18 Arthur Barstow
• CfC: FPWD of File API: Directories and System + WD of File API: Writer; deadline October 22 Arthur Barstow
• Re: Updates to FileAPI Eric Uhrhane

Thursday, 14 October 2010

• Re: [progress-events] default action suggestion Ian Hickson
• RE: Comment on Widget Interface... Phillips, Addison
• Re: [progress-events] default action suggestion Anne van Kesteren
• [progress-events] default action suggestion Arthur Barstow

Wednesday, 13 October 2010

• [Bug 10269] Step 2 of the WebIDL [[Delete]] algorithm is wrong bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• ISSUE-149 (missing key values): The multiply and other key values are missing [DOM3 Events] Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker

Tuesday, 12 October 2010

• [Bug 10583] [Selection] toString should return only the text within the selection that is visible to the user bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10798] [Selection] Find a new home for Selection bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 9514] [Selection] Specify Selection.modify() bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10691] [Selection] Specify extend method for Selection objects bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 10624] [Selection] Selection anchorNode/anchorOffset/focusNode/focusOffset do not match existing browser behaviour bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Updates to FileAPI Eric Uhrhane
• Re: Updates to FileAPI Arun Ranganathan
• Re: Updates to FileAPI Eric Uhrhane
• Updates to FileAPI Arun Ranganathan
• RE: Comment on Widget Interface... Phillips, Addison
• Re: Comment on Widget Interface... Arthur Barstow
• Re: [widgets] Best practice / recommendation for widget id scheme? Arthur Barstow
• [Bug 10985] The sentence "The subprotocol names must all be non-empty ASCII strings with no control characters and not spaces in them (i.e. only characters in the range U+0021 to U+007E)." should actually read: "The subprotocol names must all be non-empty ASCII strin bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [WebIDL] outstanding bugs? Anne van Kesteren

Monday, 11 October 2010

• Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18 Shiki Okasaka

Tuesday, 12 October 2010

• Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18 Shiki Okasaka
• [Bug 10546] It looks like at least some browsers restrict legend display values to "block" bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18 Cameron McCormack

Monday, 11 October 2010

• Fwd: ECMA TC 39 WebIDL meeting open to W3C members Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18 Jonas Sicking
• Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18 Anne van Kesteren
• CfC: publish a new Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18 Arthur Barstow

Sunday, 10 October 2010

• Re: ISSUE-141 (IME examples): IME examples [DOM3 Events] timeless
• Re: ISSUE-137 (IME-keypress): Should keypress events fire when using an IME? [DOM3 Events] timeless
• Re: Seeking agenda items for WebApps' Nov 1-2 f2f meeting timeless
• Re: [widgets] Best practice / recommendation for widget id scheme? timeless
• Re: A URL API timeless
• Re: [widgets] Draft minutes from 23 September 2010 voice conf timeless
• Re: XHR2 proposal: support for informational responses timeless
• Re: ISSUE-122 (add mousewheel): Consider adding 'mousewheel' again [DOM3 Events] timeless

Friday, 8 October 2010

• Re: Fwd: Re: CfC: publish a new WD of Progress Events; deadline October 14 Charles McCathieNevile
• PFWG requirements: enable device independent access to event handlers Gregory J. Rosmaita

Thursday, 7 October 2010

• [Bug 10896] enable device independent access to event handlers bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Fwd: Re: CfC: publish a new WD of Progress Events; deadline October 14 Arthur Barstow
• CfC: publish a new WD of Progress Events; deadline October 14 Arthur Barstow
• [widgets] Draft minutes from 7 October 2010 voice conf Arthur Barstow
• XBL2 CR and the Sept 2010 version of XBL [Was: Re: Comments on proposed editor's draft of XBL2 from Forms WG] Arthur Barstow

Wednesday, 6 October 2010

• [Bug 10977] Properties should be on prototypes, not on objects, in the ECMAScript binding bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: ISSUE-144 (propagation exceptions): exceptions in handlers during event propagation [DOM3 Events] Garrett Smith
• Re: ISSUE-144 (propagation exceptions): exceptions in handlers during event propagation [DOM3 Events] Jonas Sicking
• [widget] Draft agenda for 7 October 2010 voice conf Arthur Barstow
• [Bug 10985] New: The sentence "The subprotocol names must all be non-empty ASCII strings with no control characters and not spaces in them (i.e. only characters in the range U+0021 to U+007E)." should actually read: "The subprotocol names must all be non-empty ASCII strin bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: [widgets] Seeking review of Widgets Dig Sig Test Suite kuehne@trustable.de
• Re: ISSUE-145 (event handler ordering): Ordering event handlers registered by different means [DOM3 Events] Garrett Smith
• ISSUE-148 (modularize d3e): Consider modularizing DOM3 Events [DOM3 Events] Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-147 (event re-dispatching): re-dispatching an event that already has its flow started [DOM3 Events] Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-146 (capture-phase targets): Capture-phase listeners invoked on targets [DOM3 Events] Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-145 (event handler ordering): Ordering event handlers registered by different means [DOM3 Events] Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-144 (propagation exceptions): exceptions in handlers during event propagation [DOM3 Events] Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-143 (editorial d3e): DOM3 Events section 3 editorial errors [DOM3 Events] Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-142 (multiple keypress): one keydown might fire multiple keypress/textInput events [DOM3 Events] Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-141 (IME examples): IME examples [DOM3 Events] Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-140 (textInput keydown keypress): textInput event as default action of both keydown and keypress? [DOM3 Events] Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-139 (clarify key repeat): Define which events repeat when a key is held down [DOM3 Events] Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-138 (keyboard mapping): Define "keyboard mapping" [DOM3 Events] Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-137 (IME-keypress): Should keypress events fire when using an IME? [DOM3 Events] Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-136 (getCoordsAt): Consider adding MouseEvent.getCoordsAt(element) Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker

Tuesday, 5 October 2010

• Re: [progress-events] Update Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Comment on Widget Interface... Marcos Caceres
• [Bug 10798] Find a new home for Selection bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• RE: Seeking agenda items for WebApps' Nov 1-2 f2f meeting Eliot Graff
• Re: [progress-events] Update Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [progress-events] Update Olli Pettay
• [Bug 10382] [IndexedDB] Note on avoiding reader/writer starvation bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [widgets] RfC: LCWD of Widget Packaging and Configuration; comment deadline October 26 Arthur Barstow
• [progress-events] Update Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Seeking agenda items for WebApps' Nov 1-2 f2f meeting Arthur Barstow
• Re: Comment on Widget Interface... Phillips, Addison
• Re: Comment on Widget Interface... Scott Wilson
• [XHR2] overrideMimeType behavior James Robinson
• XHR: Unicode signature stripping Bjoern Hoehrmann
• RE: Seeking agenda items for WebApps' Nov 1-2 f2f meeting Pablo Castro
• Re: [IndexedDB] Explicitly stablishing the timing of clone creation Pablo Castro

Monday, 4 October 2010

• Re: File descriptors Boris Zbarsky

Tuesday, 5 October 2010

• [Bug 10977] New: Properties should be on prototypes, not on objects, in the ECMAScript binding bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Comment on Widget Interface... Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: File descriptors Jonas Sicking

Monday, 4 October 2010

• Re: File descriptors Eric Uhrhane
• [Bug 10930] CanvasPixelArray out of range behavior needs clarification bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: File descriptors lmarcetic@foi.hr
• Re: Comment on Widget Interface... Scott Wilson
• Re: File descriptors Jonas Sicking
• Web Notifications: please use public-web-notification [Was: Interacting with notifications] Arthur Barstow
• Re: File descriptors Eric Uhrhane
• Interacting with notifications Jimmy Forrester-Fellowes
• File descriptors lmarcetic@foi.hr
• Re: [XHR2] Comments on the 7 September working draft Sergiu Dumitriu

Saturday, 2 October 2010

• ISSUE-135 (DOMAttributeChangeRequestEvent): Consider adding DOMAttributeChangeRequestEvent Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: [widgets] Best practice / recommendation for widget id scheme? Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] Widget API Test Suite Updated, was Re: ACTION-585: After TWI test suite updated, send an annoucement to public-webapps (Web Applications Working Group) Marcos Caceres
• [widgets] Widget API Test Suite Updated, was Re: ACTION-585: After TWI test suite updated, send an annoucement to public-webapps (Web Applications Working Group) Marcos Caceres

Friday, 1 October 2010

• [Bug 10798] Find a new home for Selection bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Last message date: Thursday, 30 December 2010 23:43:21 UTC