Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType"

On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Boris Zbarsky <> wrote:

> On 10/27/10 2:28 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
>> I think it's about performance as well as implementor convenience.  If
>> the implementor knows up front that the data should be stored as a Blob,
>> then the implementor can write the data to disk without having to waste
>> memory.
> I have no problem with hinting to the implementor that the result is
> expected to be used as a Blob so they can optimistically store it to disk.
>  My problem is with then making it impossible to get it as a string if
> needed later (which would just involve reading the data from disk into
> memory).
> -Boris

Yes, but doing so is inefficient since the API requires the data to be in
memory synchronously.  We don't want to block the UI thread on disk IO.


Received on Wednesday, 27 October 2010 07:21:52 UTC