- From: Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 15:34:28 -0800
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
How 'bouts a shorter version of Tab's suggestion: "Web Components" ? On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 5:59 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote: > On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:51:39 +0100, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com> wrote: >> >> On Dec 14, 2010, at 22:24 , Dimitri Glazkov wrote: >>> >>> Looking at the use cases and the problems the current XBL2 spec is >>> trying address, I think it might be a good idea to rename it into >>> something that is less legacy-bound? >> >> I strongly object. We have a long and proud tradition of perfectly >> horrible and meaningless names such as XMLHttpRequest. I don't see why we'd >> ever have to change. >> >> Shadow HTML Anonymous DOm for the Web! > > Cause I know you are being serious I will be serious as well and point out > that XMLHttpRequest's name is legacy bound as that is what implementations > call it and applications are using. XBL2 has none of that. > > > -- > Anne van Kesteren > http://annevankesteren.nl/ > >
Received on Tuesday, 21 December 2010 23:35:27 UTC