- From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 16:17:16 +0100
- To: "public-Webapps@w3.org" <public-Webapps@w3.org>
- CC: Hari Kumar G <harig@opera.com>
Hi,
We found a tiny spec bug in section 9.1.16. Algorithm to Process a
Configuration Document.
The following two conformance requirements are wrong:
http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/#ta-BxjoiWHaMr
http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/#ta-UScJfQHPPy
Currently, they say (error donoted by ** **):
[[
C. If the height attribute is used, then let normalized height be the
result of applying the rule for parsing a non-negative integer to the
value of the attribute. If the normalized height is not in error and
greater than **or equal to 0**, then let widget height be the value of
normalized height. If the height attribute is in error, then the user
agent must ignore the attribute. {ta-BxjoiWHaMr}
D. If the width attribute is used, then let normalized width be the
result of applying the rule for parsing a non-negative integer to the
value of the attribute. If the normalized width is not in error and
greater than **or equal to 0**, then let widget width be the value of
normalized width. If the width attribute is in error, then the user
agent must ignore the attribute. {ta-UScJfQHPPy}
]]
Should read:
[[
If the height attribute is used, then let normalized height be the
result of applying the rule for parsing a non-negative integer to the
value of the attribute. If the normalized height is not in error and
greater than 0, then let widget height be the value of normalized
height. If the height attribute is in error, then the user agent must
ignore the attribute. {ta-BxjoiWHaMr}
If the width attribute is used, then let normalized width be the result
of applying the rule for parsing a non-negative integer to the value of
the attribute. If the normalized width is not in error and greater than
0, then let widget width be the value of normalized width. If the width
attribute is in error, then the user agent must ignore the attribute.
{ta-UScJfQHPPy}
]]
In other words, "or equal to 0" should not have been there. I thought I
had fixed this already:( I had fixed it for icons, it seems, but not for
the widget element.
Spec has been updated and committed.
Kind regards,
Marcos
--
Marcos Caceres
Opera Software
Received on Thursday, 11 November 2010 15:17:50 UTC