- From: Eric Uhrhane <ericu@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 11:36:54 -0800
- To: Arun Ranganathan <aranganathan@mozilla.com>
- Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Web Applications Working Group WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, public-device-apis <public-device-apis@w3.org>, Jian Li <jianli@chromium.org>
SGTM On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Arun Ranganathan <aranganathan@mozilla.com> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> On 11/12/10 11:53 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: >> > OK, then we need to define rules for instantiating a Date object >> > here >> > (in the face of strings that may or may not be valid date format >> > strings, or may be ambiguous, note). Is the proposal to just call >> > new >> > Date(str)? >> >> Er, nevermind. We're talking about file modification dates, not web >> resource modification dates, so my concern is unfounded. > > > Right -- to be totally clear, we're talking about http://www.w3.org/TR/FileAPI/#dfn-file having a readonly Date attribute that returns the last modified on disk data. > > -- A* >
Received on Monday, 15 November 2010 19:37:40 UTC