- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:32:35 -0700
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: Arun Ranganathan <arun@mozilla.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, Adam Barth <abarth@gmail.com>, Darin Fisher <darin@google.com>
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote: > On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:09:24 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: >> >> I would be ok with moz prefixing, though it would be nice to try to >> find a solution pretty quickly if all this is is a discussion about >> finding an appropriate name for this function. > > Well, if people agree with me that the appropriate place would be the URL > object -- assuming for now we are going to get that -- it would be more > involved than just renaming. What would the revoking API look like? Or are you saying that there would be no way to get a string representation of the URL and instead things like img.src should accept URL objects in addition to strings? / Jonas
Received on Monday, 18 October 2010 16:33:30 UTC