Re: Hash functions

On 12/20/10 9:49 PM, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> Pushing gigabytes through it is plausible for most of these uses.

OK.  So we're talking multiple seconds even with a C hash 
implementation, right?  I'm looking at 5 seconds per gigabyte here for 
the command-line utility I see.

I guess at that point even a 2-3x slowdown over C is pretty noticeable.  :(

-Boris

Received on Wednesday, 22 December 2010 20:48:58 UTC