- From: Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:59:38 +0000
- To: Jeremy Orlow <jorlow@chromium.org>, public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Wednesday, November 24, 2010 3:01 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote: > For over a year now, the WebStorage spec has stipulated that > Local/SessionStorage store and retrieve objects per the structured clone > algorithm rather than strings. And yet there isn't a single implementation > who's implemented this. I've talked to people in the know from several of > the other major browsers and, although no one is super against implementing > it (including us), no one has it on any of their (even internal) > roadmaps. It's just not a high enough priority for anyone at the moment. > I feel pretty strongly that we should _at least_ put in some non-normative > note that no browser vendor is currently planning on implementing this > feature. Or, better yet, just remove it from the spec until support starts > emerging. I agree. We have no plans to support this in the near future either. At the very least, I think this should be noted as a "feature at risk" in the Call for Implementations [1]. Adrian. [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#cfi
Received on Monday, 29 November 2010 15:00:15 UTC