Re: Rename XBL2 to something without X, B, or L?

On Dec 14, 2010, at 22:24 , Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
> Looking at the use cases and the problems the current XBL2 spec is
> trying address, I think it might be a good idea to rename it into
> something that is less legacy-bound?

I strongly object. We have a long and proud tradition of perfectly horrible and meaningless names such as XMLHttpRequest. I don't see why we'd ever have to change.

Shadow HTML Anonymous DOm for the Web!

Robin Berjon -

Received on Thursday, 16 December 2010 13:52:11 UTC