[Bug 10336] "optional" should be allowed even if subsequent arguments aren't optional

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10336

Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX

--- Comment #1 from Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> 2010-10-28 04:23:39 UTC ---
That is in fact what the spec used to allow (with [Optional], a long time ago).
 I removed it because I deemed it confusing: it looks like you can omit dw but
still specify dh.  The three overloaded operations make it much clearer, IMO.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Received on Thursday, 28 October 2010 04:23:48 UTC