W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: [IndexedDB] .value of no-duplicate cursors

From: ben turner <bent.mozilla@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 08:13:35 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTimhG8K9OGMCN5YUE7EPuo1UV6EkOASvK7vXys=b@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Cc: Jeremy Orlow <jorlow@chromium.org>, Webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>

On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:
> The reason I specced it they way I did, with the "lowest" key always
> being used, is that this way a NEXT_NO_DUPLICATE and a
> PREV_NO_DUPLICATE cursor iterate the same entries. It seems unexpected
> that reversing direction would return different results?

I agree.

-Ben

Received on Thursday, 11 November 2010 16:14:28 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Marcos Caceres: "Re: Comments on the http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/"
Previous message: Jonas Sicking: "Re: [IndexedDB] .value of no-duplicate cursors"
In reply to: Jonas Sicking: "Re: [IndexedDB] .value of no-duplicate cursors"
Next in thread: Jeremy Orlow: "Re: [IndexedDB] .value of no-duplicate cursors"
Reply: Jeremy Orlow: "Re: [IndexedDB] .value of no-duplicate cursors"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:13:13 UTC