- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:01:44 +0100
- To: "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>, "Arun Ranganathan" <aranganathan@mozilla.com>
- Cc: "Web Applications Working Group WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>, "Jian Li" <jianli@chromium.org>, "Eric Uhrhane" <ericu@google.com>
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 22:06:59 +0100, Arun Ranganathan <aranganathan@mozilla.com> wrote: > If we're going to keep both functions around, then it's honestly not > *that much* of an improvement to move them from window* to document*, is > it? Polluting the global object less is always a win. > In this case, since we're going to add something to HTMLImageElement, > why not leave createObjectURL and revokeObject URL well alone as part of > window*? These seem like separate issues. > So it looks like we'll add a [Supplemental] to interfaces like > HTMLImageElement allowing them to take a "src" object, and we can then > define *that* src object to accomodate Stream and Blob use case > scenarios. I'm amenable to first introducing that extension to > HTMLImageElement in File API if everyone else is :) It is probably better to do this directly in HTML5. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Friday, 12 November 2010 11:02:32 UTC