- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:59:06 +0100
- To: "Dimitri Glazkov" <dglazkov@google.com>, "Robin Berjon" <robin@berjon.com>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:51:39 +0100, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com> wrote: > On Dec 14, 2010, at 22:24 , Dimitri Glazkov wrote: >> Looking at the use cases and the problems the current XBL2 spec is >> trying address, I think it might be a good idea to rename it into >> something that is less legacy-bound? > > I strongly object. We have a long and proud tradition of perfectly > horrible and meaningless names such as XMLHttpRequest. I don't see why > we'd ever have to change. > > Shadow HTML Anonymous DOm for the Web! Cause I know you are being serious I will be serious as well and point out that XMLHttpRequest's name is legacy bound as that is what implementations call it and applications are using. XBL2 has none of that. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 16 December 2010 13:59:46 UTC