On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: > On 12/14/10 11:03 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> >> Script should be able to walk and mutate >> the shadow DOM for an element > > I'm not sure I agree, in fact. Why should script be able to do this? Sorta > supporting this has been a constant source of problems in Mozilla' XBL1 > implementation, and significantly increases the complexity of correct > implementations (which Mozilla's XBL1 is not). Why is this needed? This is interesting. Can you give an example? I am wondering if you and Tab are talking about the same thing. What sorts of problems? > > -Boris >Received on Tuesday, 14 December 2010 19:17:20 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:13:14 UTC