Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18

On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote:
> Jonas Sicking:
>> My gut reaction is to leave this out from the spec and not let WebIDL
>> specify security aspects.
>
> Agreed.  It’d be fine even for other specs (HTML5?) to define their own
> security-related extended attributes to avoid writing prose that defines
> when SECURITY_ERRs get thrown, but I don’t think the place to define
> such an extended attribute is in Web IDL itself.

Sounds good to me.

/ Jonas

Received on Thursday, 21 October 2010 21:49:18 UTC