Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18

Jonas Sicking:
> My gut reaction is to leave this out from the spec and not let WebIDL
> specify security aspects.

Agreed.  It’d be fine even for other specs (HTML5?) to define their own
security-related extended attributes to avoid writing prose that defines
when SECURITY_ERRs get thrown, but I don’t think the place to define
such an extended attribute is in Web IDL itself.

Cameron McCormack ≝

Received on Thursday, 21 October 2010 21:40:17 UTC