- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:39:30 +1300
- To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Cc: Travis Leithead <travil@microsoft.com>, Shiki Okasaka <shiki.okasaka@gmail.com>, public-script-coord <public-script-coord@w3.org>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Jonas Sicking: > My gut reaction is to leave this out from the spec and not let WebIDL > specify security aspects. Agreed. It’d be fine even for other specs (HTML5?) to define their own security-related extended attributes to avoid writing prose that defines when SECURITY_ERRs get thrown, but I don’t think the place to define such an extended attribute is in Web IDL itself. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Thursday, 21 October 2010 21:40:17 UTC