public-webapps@w3.org from October to December 2010 by author

Adam Barth

• Re: Local Storage Not Retaining Data Between Local Browser Sessions (Saturday, 11 December)
• Re: A URL API (Thursday, 9 December)
• Re: Local Storage Not Retaining Data Between Local Browser Sessions (Monday, 29 November)
• Re: Use cases for Range::createContextualFragment and script nodes (Thursday, 21 October)

Adrian Bateman

• RE: Structured clone in WebStorage (Monday, 29 November)
• RE: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon (Wednesday, 17 November)
• RE: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon (Friday, 12 November)
• RE: FPWD of Web Messaging; deadline November 13 (Tuesday, 9 November)
• RE: to publish Web SQL Database as a Working Group Note; deadline November 13 (Tuesday, 9 November)

Alex Russell

• Re: Rename XBL2 to something without X, B, or L? (Tuesday, 21 December)

Alexey Proskuryakov

• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Monday, 25 October)

Andreas Kuehne

• Re: W3C XML Digital Signature Object Element Processing Issue (Wednesday, 15 December)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: Rename XBL2 to something without X, B, or L? (Thursday, 16 December)
• Re: ISSUE-173 (ericu): terminal FileWriter progress events should be queued [File API: Writer] (Friday, 10 December)
• Re: [File API] abort() (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: Structured clone in WebStorage (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: [XHR2] responseType / response / overrideMimeType proposal (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: Fwd: CfC: Last Call Working Draft of Progress Events; deadline Nov 29 (Tuesday, 30 November)
• [XHR2] responseType / response / overrideMimeType proposal (Monday, 29 November)
• [File API] abort() (Monday, 29 November)
• Re: progress events in sync XHR not entirely ruled out (Thursday, 25 November)
• Re: [ProgressEvents] How to deal with compressed transfer encodings (Tuesday, 23 November)
• Re: revokeObjectURL behavior (Wednesday, 17 November)
• CORS & ISSUE-108 (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re: [CORS] Access-Control-Expose-Headers (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re: [CORS] Multiple origin values? (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re: revokeObjectURL behavior (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Testing Requirements (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon (Saturday, 13 November)
• Re: Updates to FileAPI (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: Updates to FileAPI (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: Making non-cookie requests to another domain... possible DoS attack by forcing session expiration? (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: [XHR2] HTTP Trailers (Saturday, 30 October)
• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. (Friday, 29 October)
• Re: [XHR2] why have an asBlob attribute at all? (Friday, 29 October)
• Re: XHR: Unicode signature stripping (Friday, 29 October)
• Re: [XHR2] why have an asBlob attribute at all? (Friday, 29 October)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: [XHR2] overrideMimeType behavior (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: [XHR2] HTTP Trailers (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: createBlobURL (Monday, 25 October)
• Re: Can we remove forminput and formchange events and related dispatch methods? (Friday, 22 October)
• Re: Use cases for Range::createContextualFragment and script nodes (Friday, 22 October)
• Re: Can we remove forminput and formchange events and related dispatch methods? (Friday, 22 October)
• Re: createBlobURL (Thursday, 21 October)
• Re: createBlobURL (Thursday, 21 October)
• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Re: createBlobURL (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Re: createBlobURL (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Re: createBlobURL (Monday, 18 October)
• Re: createBlobURL (Monday, 18 October)
• Re: createBlobURL (Monday, 18 October)
• createBlobURL (was: Re: CfC: WD of File API; deadline October 22) (Monday, 18 October)
• Re: [progress-events] default action suggestion (Friday, 15 October)
• Re: [progress-events] default action suggestion (Thursday, 14 October)
• [WebIDL] outstanding bugs? (Tuesday, 12 October)
• Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18 (Monday, 11 October)
• Re: [progress-events] Update (Tuesday, 5 October)
• [progress-events] Update (Tuesday, 5 October)

Arthur Barstow

• Re: Call for Editors for Server-sent Events, Web Storage, and Web Workers (Tuesday, 14 December)
• [eventsource] Some data re Server-sent Events LC (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: Seeking status of Server-sent Events, Web Storage and Web Workers (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: Structured clone in WebStorage (Thursday, 2 December)
• Widget Embedding [was: Re: [widgets] running widgets in a regular web page ???] (Friday, 26 November)
• Seeking status of Server-sent Events, Web Storage and Web Workers (Tuesday, 23 November)
• Last Call of WOFF File Format 1.0; comment deadline December 14 (Friday, 19 November)
• Seeking feedback on Widget Interface: LocalizableString (Thursday, 18 November)
• Re: Request for Last Call review of RDFa Core 1.1; deadline (Thursday, 18 November)
• [widgets] Draft minutes for 18 November 2010 voice conf (Thursday, 18 November)
• [widgets] Draft agenda for 18 November 2010 voice conf (Wednesday, 17 November)
• CfC: Last Call Working Draft of Progress Events; deadline Nov 29 (Monday, 15 November)
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: CfC: FPWD of Web Messaging; deadline November 13 (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: CfC: to publish Web SQL Database as a Working Group Note; deadline November 13 (Wednesday, 10 November)
• [widgets] No call November 11 (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Widget packaging spec: make it clear in the Abstract or Intro that P&C widgets != UI controls (Sunday, 7 November)
• CfC: to publish Web SQL Database as a Working Group Note; deadline November 13 (Saturday, 6 November)
• CfC: FPWD of Web Messaging; deadline November 13 (Saturday, 6 November)
• [DataCache] Status and plans for Programmable HTTP Caching and Serving? (Friday, 5 November)
• Minutes from WebApps' 2 November 2010 meeting (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Notes from WebApps' 1 November 2010 "Gathering" (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Agendas for WebApps' Nov 1-2 f2f meeting (Friday, 29 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Tuesday, 26 October)
• [widgets] Draft minutes from 21 October 2010 voice conf (Thursday, 21 October)
• [widgets] Draft agenda for 21 October 2010 voice conf (Wednesday, 20 October)
• [widgets] Reminder: RfC: LCWD of Widget Packaging and Configuration; comment deadline October 26 (Tuesday, 19 October)
• CfC: WD of File API; deadline October 22 (Monday, 18 October)
• Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18 (Friday, 15 October)
• CfC: FPWD of File API: Directories and System + WD of File API: Writer; deadline October 22 (Friday, 15 October)
• [progress-events] default action suggestion (Thursday, 14 October)
• Re: Comment on Widget Interface... (Tuesday, 12 October)
• Re: [widgets] Best practice / recommendation for widget id scheme? (Tuesday, 12 October)
• CfC: publish a new Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18 (Monday, 11 October)
• Fwd: Re: CfC: publish a new WD of Progress Events; deadline October 14 (Thursday, 7 October)
• CfC: publish a new WD of Progress Events; deadline October 14 (Thursday, 7 October)
• [widgets] Draft minutes from 7 October 2010 voice conf (Thursday, 7 October)
• XBL2 CR and the Sept 2010 version of XBL [Was: Re: Comments on proposed editor's draft of XBL2 from Forms WG] (Thursday, 7 October)
• [widget] Draft agenda for 7 October 2010 voice conf (Wednesday, 6 October)
• [widgets] RfC: LCWD of Widget Packaging and Configuration; comment deadline October 26 (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Re: Seeking agenda items for WebApps' Nov 1-2 f2f meeting (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Web Notifications: please use public-web-notification [Was: Interacting with notifications] (Monday, 4 October)

Arun Ranganathan

• Re: Updates to FileAPI (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: Updates to FileAPI (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: Updates to FileAPI (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: Updates to FileAPI (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: Updates to FileAPI (Monday, 20 December)
• Re: Updates to FileAPI (Saturday, 18 December)
• Re: [File API] abort() (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: [File API] abort() (Friday, 3 December)
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon (Thursday, 18 November)
• Re: revokeObjectURL behavior (Thursday, 18 November)
• Re: Updates to FileAPI (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: FileAPI editorial nit (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon (Thursday, 11 November)
• Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: Updates to FileAPI (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: Updates to FileAPI (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: createBlobURL (Thursday, 21 October)
• Re: createBlobURL (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Re: createBlobURL (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Re: Updates to FileAPI (Monday, 18 October)
• Re: createBlobURL (Monday, 18 October)
• Re: createBlobURL (Monday, 18 October)
• Re: Updates to FileAPI (Tuesday, 12 October)
• Updates to FileAPI (Tuesday, 12 October)

Axel Rauschmayer

• Re: [IndexedDB] Why rely on run-to-completion? (Thursday, 30 December)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Why rely on run-to-completion? (Thursday, 30 December)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Why rely on run-to-completion? (Thursday, 30 December)
• [IndexedDB] Why rely on run-to-completion? (Wednesday, 29 December)

ben turner

• Re: [IndexedDB] .value of no-duplicate cursors (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators (Wednesday, 10 November)

Bjoern Hoehrmann

• Re: Structured clone in WebStorage (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: [cors] 27 July 2010 CORS feedback (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: [cors] 27 July 2010 CORS feedback (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: [ProgressEvents] How to deal with compressed transfer encodings (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: [ProgressEvents] How to deal with compressed transfer encodings (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)? (Saturday, 20 November)
• Re: [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)? (Saturday, 20 November)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Saturday, 20 November)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Saturday, 20 November)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: Making non-cookie requests to another domain... possible DoS attack by forcing session expiration? (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: [XHR2] HTTP Trailers (Saturday, 30 October)
• Re: [XHR2] HTTP Trailers (Saturday, 30 October)
• XHR: Unicode signature stripping (Tuesday, 5 October)

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Thursday, 30 December)
• Re: Hash functions (Wednesday, 22 December)
• Re: Hash functions (Wednesday, 22 December)
• Re: Hash functions (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Friday, 17 December)
• Re: Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Thursday, 16 December)
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Thursday, 16 December)
• Re: Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Thursday, 16 December)
• Re: Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Wednesday, 15 December)
• Re: Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Wednesday, 15 December)
• Re: Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Wednesday, 15 December)
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Wednesday, 15 December)
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Wednesday, 15 December)
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Wednesday, 15 December)
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: using BlobBuilder append method with generated binary data (Sunday, 12 December)
• Re: [ProgressEvents] How to deal with compressed transfer encodings (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: [cors] 27 July 2010 CORS feedback (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Thursday, 18 November)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Thursday, 18 November)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Monday, 15 November)
• Re: Updates to FileAPI (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: Updates to FileAPI (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Monday, 1 November)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Saturday, 30 October)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Friday, 29 October)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Friday, 29 October)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Friday, 29 October)
• Re: [XHR2] why have an asBlob attribute at all? (Friday, 29 October)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Thursday, 28 October)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Monday, 25 October)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Monday, 25 October)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Monday, 25 October)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Monday, 25 October)
• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Re: File descriptors (Monday, 4 October)

Brandon Sterne

• Re: [Widgets] Mozilla open apps (Wednesday, 20 October)

Bryan Sullivan

• Widgets and OAuth or other similar redirect-based protocols (Monday, 1 November)

bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

• [Bug 11619] who is the president of the United States? (Thursday, 30 December)
• [Bug 11619] New: who is the president of the United States? (Thursday, 30 December)
• [Bug 11615] New: save text from an editor in a file system (Wednesday, 29 December)
• [Bug 11606] New: wanted: awareness of non-persistent web storage (Sunday, 26 December)
• [Bug 11589] New: It is said that "Values can be any data type supported by the structured clone algorithm", but the algorithm is not described. In fact is it deeply buried in the HTML5 specification, open to fuzzy interpretations. Values are a fundamental part of any data (Wednesday, 22 December)
• [Bug 11581] New: Is there really need to drop http compability ? This will cause lot of troubles in some http-servers and browsers. This will force developers to use ugly hacks like flash/java based implementations. Is there any reason, wht not to create real robust http- (Monday, 20 December)
• [Bug 11571] http://mntaxwaste.blogspot.com/ what is this and where did it come from (Saturday, 18 December)
• [Bug 11571] New: http://mntaxwaste.blogspot.com/ what is this and where did it come from (Saturday, 18 December)
• [Bug 11570] New: Can't find the posibility for user authentication by connecting to a websocket! Missing? (Friday, 17 December)
• [Bug 11567] New: IndexedDB should utilize the new WebIDL static feature (Friday, 17 December)
• [Bug 11564] New: Remove all references to manually populated indexes (Thursday, 16 December)
• [Bug 11553] New: Ensure indexedDBSync is on the right worker interface (Wednesday, 15 December)
• [Bug 11552] New: We should remove timeout from IndexedDB. (Tuesday, 14 December)
• [Bug 11530] No transaction should start until after all others that were created first and whose scope overlaps (Friday, 10 December)
• [Bug 11530] New: No transaction should start until after all others that were created first and whose scope overlaps (Friday, 10 December)
• [Bug 11527] Remove dynamic transactions from the spec (Friday, 10 December)
• [Bug 11528] New: We should add some form of dynamic transaction to IndexedDB (Friday, 10 December)
• [Bug 11527] New: Remove dynamic transactions from the spec (Friday, 10 December)
• [Bug 11349] [IndexedDB] Null should not be a valid key type (Friday, 10 December)
• [Bug 11389] IDBTransaction.READ_ONLY should probably be 0 (Friday, 10 December)
• [Bug 9769] IDBObjectStoreRequest/Sync.put should be split into 3 methods (Friday, 10 December)
• [Bug 10303] Transactions should not commit if code unwinds because of an exception (Friday, 10 December)
• [Bug 10590] [IndexedDB] Default timeout duration needs to be specced (Friday, 10 December)
• [Bug 11407] [IndexedDB] IDBDatabase.createObjectStore: autoIncrement should not default to true (Friday, 10 December)
• [Bug 11439] New: Extend ProgressEvent with position and totalSize attributes (Tuesday, 30 November)
• [Bug 11425] New: [IndexedDB] Transaction timeout parameter should probably be a double (Monday, 29 November)
• [Bug 11419] New: Local Storage Data Not Retained Between Sessions When Running Browser Locally (Sunday, 28 November)
• [Bug 11407] New: [IndexedDB] IDBDatabase.createObjectStore: autoIncrement should not default to true (Thursday, 25 November)
• [Bug 11406] New: [IndexedDB] IDBDatabase.transaction needs to specify exception for invalid mode parameter (Thursday, 25 November)
• [Bug 11401] New: [IndexedDB] We should disallow .transaction() from within setVersion transactions (Wednesday, 24 November)
• [Bug 11398] New: [IndexedDB] Methods that take multiple optional parameters should instead take an options object (Wednesday, 24 November)
• [Bug 11396] New: Add a callback to IDBDatabaseSync.transaction (Wednesday, 24 November)
• [Bug 11394] New: We should throw if continue() is called with a key <= the current position (Tuesday, 23 November)
• [Bug 11389] New: IDBTransaction.READ_ONLY should probably be 0 (Tuesday, 23 November)
• [Bug 11385] New: Bring the sync APIs back in sync with the async ones (Tuesday, 23 November)
• [Bug 11376] New: IDBObjectStore.put's DATA_ERR description needs clarification (Monday, 22 November)
• [Bug 10302] Introduce exception handlers at the transaction/database scope (Monday, 22 November)
• [Bug 11375] New: [IndexedDB] Error codes need to be assigned new numbers (Monday, 22 November)
• [Bug 11358] New: Should addEventListener's last argument be optional? (Saturday, 20 November)
• [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)? (Friday, 19 November)
• [Bug 11350] New: [IndexedDB] ObjectStores should have a way to hint that they're "evictable" (Friday, 19 November)
• [Bug 11349] New: [IndexedDB] Null should not be a valid key type (Friday, 19 November)
• [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model (Friday, 19 November)
• [Bug 11280] IDBFactory.databases doesn't work (Friday, 12 November)
• [Bug 10527] [IndexedDB] Result of IDBCursor.remove and update unspecified. (Thursday, 11 November)
• [Bug 11276] Specify deleteDatabase (Tuesday, 9 November)
• [Bug 11280] New: IDBFactory.databases doesn't work (Tuesday, 9 November)
• [Bug 11276] New: Specify deleteDatabase (Tuesday, 9 November)
• [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators (Tuesday, 9 November)
• [Bug 11269] New: Evaluating keyPaths needs to be better specified (Tuesday, 9 November)
• [Bug 11266] Add IDBObjectStore.clear() (Monday, 8 November)
• [Bug 11266] New: Add IDBObjectStore.clear() (Monday, 8 November)
• [Bug 9882] Behavior when attempting to write data to an objectStore opened as read only unspecified (Monday, 8 November)
• [Bug 10402] [IndexedDB] IDBCursor.remove/update behavior when at end of range unspecified (Monday, 8 November)
• [Bug 10430] [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior (Monday, 8 November)
• [Bug 11187] [IndexedDB] Repeated calls to IDBCursor.continue() should throw (Monday, 8 November)
• [Bug 10088] The spec does not define what happens if an object store is modified while a cursor is iterating it. (Monday, 8 November)
• [Bug 11094] [IndexedDB] IDBIndex.get* don't define which item is returned in the case of duplicates (Monday, 8 November)
• [Bug 11246] Remove IDBCursor(Sync).count (Monday, 8 November)
• [Bug 10058] Specify order for indexes which contain duplicate key values (Monday, 8 November)
• [Bug 11257] New: Should IDBCursor.update be able to create a new entry? (Monday, 8 November)
• [Bug 11246] New: Remove IDBCursor(Sync).count (Saturday, 6 November)
• [Bug 11190] New: Make scripts created by createContextualFragment() executable (Monday, 1 November)
• [Bug 11187] New: [IndexedDB] Repeated calls to IDBCursor.continue() should throw (Monday, 1 November)
• [Bug 10431] [IndexedDB] Remove IDBDatabase.objectStore() (Monday, 1 November)
• [Bug 9790] Request is not a good suffix for all the async interfaces in IndexedDB (Monday, 1 November)
• [Bug 10397] [IndexedDB] "upper" and "lower" bounds would be much clearer than right/left (Friday, 29 October)
• [Bug 10396] [IndexedDB] LEFT_BOUND and RIGHT_BOUND could be a bit more clear (Friday, 29 October)
• [Bug 10007] Async callbacks should fire in the same order the async requests are made in IndexedDB. (Friday, 29 October)
• [Bug 10765] [IndexedDB] Need to add an onblocked event to what's returned from setVersion (Friday, 29 October)
• [Bug 9562] Opening a database with a different description is underspecified (Friday, 29 October)
• [Bug 10305] [IndexedDB] Transactions need to be clarified (Friday, 29 October)
• [Bug 11164] New: There is no way to get from an error event to other objectStores (Friday, 29 October)
• [Bug 11157] carasen (Thursday, 28 October)
• [Bug 11157] New: carasen (Thursday, 28 October)
• [Bug 10609] DOMTimeStamp should be defined in Web IDL (Thursday, 28 October)
• [Bug 10597] Array type missing from IDL grammar (Thursday, 28 October)
• [Bug 10336] "optional" should be allowed even if subsequent arguments aren't optional (Thursday, 28 October)
• [Bug 10674] [IndexedDB] Changes to indexes (and their cursors) (Monday, 25 October)
• [Bug 10765] [IndexedDB] Need to add an onblocked event to what's returned from setVersion (Monday, 25 October)
• [Bug 10765] New: [IndexedDB] Need to add an onblocked event to what's returned from setVersion (Monday, 25 October)
• [Bug 10027] Remove explicit add/remove functions from IDBIndex (Monday, 25 October)
• [Bug 10426] [IndexedDB] All interfaces (except IDBEnvironment*) should not have NoInterfaceObject (Monday, 25 October)
• [Bug 10304] Rename "remove" method on object store to "delete" (Friday, 22 October)
• [Bug 11104] [IndexedDB] removeObjectStore/Index should be renamed to delete___ (Friday, 22 October)
• [Bug 11117] this is a test message (Friday, 22 October)
• [Bug 10584] toString does not represent what WebKit and Mozilla do, which is to return only the text within the selection that is visible to the user. (Friday, 22 October)
• [Bug 11117] New: this is a test message (Friday, 22 October)
• [Bug 11113] New: [IndexedDB] The spec should be more explicit about the queuing of setVersion transactions (Thursday, 21 October)
• [Bug 11104] New: [IndexedDB] removeObjectStore/Index should be renamed to delete___ (Wednesday, 20 October)
• [Bug 11097] New: [IndexedDB] Behavior of .close() is not completely specified (Tuesday, 19 October)
• [Bug 11094] New: [IndexedDB] IDBIndex.get* don't define which item is returned in the case of duplicates (Tuesday, 19 October)
• [Bug 10269] Step 2 of the WebIDL [[Delete]] algorithm is wrong (Wednesday, 13 October)
• [Bug 10583] [Selection] toString should return only the text within the selection that is visible to the user (Tuesday, 12 October)
• [Bug 10798] [Selection] Find a new home for Selection (Tuesday, 12 October)
• [Bug 9514] [Selection] Specify Selection.modify() (Tuesday, 12 October)
• [Bug 10691] [Selection] Specify extend method for Selection objects (Tuesday, 12 October)
• [Bug 10624] [Selection] Selection anchorNode/anchorOffset/focusNode/focusOffset do not match existing browser behaviour (Tuesday, 12 October)
• [Bug 10985] The sentence "The subprotocol names must all be non-empty ASCII strings with no control characters and not spaces in them (i.e. only characters in the range U+0021 to U+007E)." should actually read: "The subprotocol names must all be non-empty ASCII strin (Tuesday, 12 October)
• [Bug 10546] It looks like at least some browsers restrict legend display values to "block" (Tuesday, 12 October)
• [Bug 10896] enable device independent access to event handlers (Thursday, 7 October)
• [Bug 10977] Properties should be on prototypes, not on objects, in the ECMAScript binding (Wednesday, 6 October)
• [Bug 10985] New: The sentence "The subprotocol names must all be non-empty ASCII strings with no control characters and not spaces in them (i.e. only characters in the range U+0021 to U+007E)." should actually read: "The subprotocol names must all be non-empty ASCII strin (Wednesday, 6 October)
• [Bug 10798] Find a new home for Selection (Tuesday, 5 October)
• [Bug 10382] [IndexedDB] Note on avoiding reader/writer starvation (Tuesday, 5 October)
• [Bug 10977] New: Properties should be on prototypes, not on objects, in the ECMAScript binding (Tuesday, 5 October)
• [Bug 10930] CanvasPixelArray out of range behavior needs clarification (Monday, 4 October)
• [Bug 10798] Find a new home for Selection (Friday, 1 October)

Cameron McCormack

• Re: [Bug 11406] New: [IndexedDB] IDBDatabase.transaction needs to specify exception for invalid mode parameter (Friday, 10 December)
• Re: [Bug 11406] New: [IndexedDB] IDBDatabase.transaction needs to specify exception for invalid mode parameter (Friday, 10 December)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Friday, 19 November)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Friday, 19 November)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon (Sunday, 14 November)
• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. (Tuesday, 2 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] IDBKeyRange cleanup (Tuesday, 2 November)
• Re: Questions about API Design, composability and multiple arguments (Tuesday, 2 November)
• Re: Feedback requested on returning null/void or throwing an exception (Sunday, 31 October)
• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. (Sunday, 31 October)
• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. (Saturday, 30 October)
• Re: Feedback requested on returning null/void or throwing an exception (Thursday, 28 October)
• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18 (Thursday, 21 October)
• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18 (Tuesday, 12 October)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Re: CfC: FPWD of Web Messaging; deadline November 13 (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: CfC: FPWD of Web Messaging; deadline November 13 (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: DOM3 Events last call comment (Friday, 22 October)
• Re: Fwd: Re: CfC: publish a new WD of Progress Events; deadline October 14 (Friday, 8 October)
• Re: [progress-events] Update (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Re: Comment on Widget Interface... (Tuesday, 5 October)

Charles Pritchard

• Re: Hash functions (Wednesday, 22 December)
• Re: FileAPI use case: making an image downloading app (Saturday, 18 December)
• Re: FileAPI use case: making an image downloading app (Saturday, 18 December)
• Re: using BlobBuilder append method with generated binary data (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: Seeking status of Server-sent Events, Web Storage and Web Workers (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: continue as a reserved word and a conflict with IndexedDB (Monday, 6 December)
• continue as a reserved word and a conflict with IndexedDB (Monday, 6 December)

Chris Marrin

• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Monday, 1 November)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Monday, 1 November)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Monday, 25 October)

Chris Rogers

• Re: [XHR2] responseType / response / overrideMimeType proposal (Monday, 29 November)
• Re: [XHR2] responseType / response / overrideMimeType proposal (Monday, 29 November)
• Re: [XHR2] responseType / response / overrideMimeType proposal (Monday, 29 November)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Tuesday, 2 November)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Thursday, 28 October)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Tuesday, 26 October)
• XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Monday, 25 October)

Darin Adler

• Re: continue as a reserved word and a conflict with IndexedDB (Tuesday, 7 December)

Darin Fisher

• Re: Structured clone in WebStorage (Friday, 3 December)
• Re: Structured clone in WebStorage (Friday, 3 December)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Friday, 19 November)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Thursday, 18 November)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: createBlobURL (Wednesday, 20 October)

David Flanagan

• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Tuesday, 2 November)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Tuesday, 2 November)
• Re: [XHR2] why have an asBlob attribute at all? (Friday, 29 October)
• Re: [XHR2] why have an asBlob attribute at all? (Friday, 29 October)
• [XHR2] why have an asBlob attribute at all? (Thursday, 28 October)

deepak

• W3C XML Digital Signature Object Element Processing Issue (Wednesday, 15 December)

Dimitri Glazkov

• Re: Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Thursday, 16 December)
• Re: Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Thursday, 16 December)
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Thursday, 16 December)
• Re: Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Thursday, 16 December)
• Re: Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Wednesday, 15 December)
• Re: Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Wednesday, 15 December)
• Re: Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Wednesday, 15 December)
• Rename XBL2 to something without X, B, or L? (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Sunday, 12 December)
• XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Saturday, 11 December)

Dirk Pranke

• Re: Rename XBL2 to something without X, B, or L? (Wednesday, 22 December)
• Re: CORS & ISSUE-108 (Tuesday, 23 November)

Dmitry Titov

• Re: clipboard events (Thursday, 23 December)
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon (Tuesday, 16 November)

Doug Schepers

• Added 'locale' to Text, Keyboard, and Composition Events [ISSUE-119] (Thursday, 23 December)
• Re: Call for Editors for Server-sent Events, Web Storage, and Web Workers (Monday, 13 December)
• Re: Call for Editors for Server-sent Events, Web Storage, and Web Workers (Monday, 13 December)
• Re: Call for Editors for Server-sent Events, Web Storage, and Web Workers (Monday, 13 December)
• Call for Editors for Server-sent Events, Web Storage, and Web Workers (Monday, 13 December)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Sunday, 28 November)
• Re: [Widgets] Mozilla open apps (Thursday, 21 October)

Drew Wilson

• Re: [Bug 11606] New: wanted: awareness of non-persistent web storage (Tuesday, 28 December)

Eliot Graff

• RE: Seeking agenda items for WebApps' Nov 1-2 f2f meeting (Tuesday, 5 October)

Eric Uhrhane

• Re: ISSUE-173 (ericu): terminal FileWriter progress events should be queued [File API: Writer] (Friday, 10 December)
• Re: ISSUE-173 (ericu): terminal FileWriter progress events should be queued [File API: Writer] (Friday, 10 December)
• Re: FileSystem API: Avoiding Upload Forms And Temporary Downloads (Wednesday, 1 December)
• progress events in sync XHR not entirely ruled out (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: Updates to FileAPI (Monday, 15 November)
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: Updates to FileAPI (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: Minutes from WebApps' 2 November 2010 meeting (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Monday, 25 October)
• Re: using BlobBuilder append method with generated binary data (Wednesday, 20 October)
• Re: Updates to FileAPI (Monday, 18 October)
• Re: CfC: WD of File API; deadline October 22 (Monday, 18 October)
• Re: Updates to FileAPI (Friday, 15 October)
• Re: Updates to FileAPI (Tuesday, 12 October)
• Re: Updates to FileAPI (Tuesday, 12 October)
• Re: File descriptors (Monday, 4 October)
• Re: File descriptors (Monday, 4 October)

Erik Arvidsson

• Re: Can we remove forminput and formchange events and related dispatch methods? (Friday, 22 October)
• Re: Can we remove forminput and formchange events and related dispatch methods? (Friday, 22 October)
• Can we remove forminput and formchange events and related dispatch methods? (Thursday, 21 October)
• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. (Tuesday, 19 October)
• DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. (Tuesday, 19 October)

Garrett Smith

• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. (Tuesday, 2 November)
• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. (Saturday, 30 October)
• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: ISSUE-2 (OnFoo Attributes): Event Handler Attributes (onfoo Attributes) and Add/Remove Event Listener [DOM3 Events] (Thursday, 21 October)
• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Re: ISSUE-144 (propagation exceptions): exceptions in handlers during event propagation [DOM3 Events] (Wednesday, 6 October)
• Re: ISSUE-145 (event handler ordering): Ordering event handlers registered by different means [DOM3 Events] (Wednesday, 6 October)

Geoffrey Garen

• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Wednesday, 27 October)

Getify

• Re: Making non-cookie requests to another domain... possible DoS attack by forcing session expiration? (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Making non-cookie requests to another domain... possible DoS attack by forcing session expiration? (Wednesday, 10 November)

Glenn Maynard

• Re: [IndexedDB] Why rely on run-to-completion? (Thursday, 30 December)
• Re: Web workers: synchronously handling events (Wednesday, 29 December)
• Re: [Bug 11606] New: wanted: awareness of non-persistent web storage (Tuesday, 28 December)
• Re: Web workers: synchronously handling events (Tuesday, 28 December)
• Re: [Bug 11606] New: wanted: awareness of non-persistent web storage (Tuesday, 28 December)
• Re: [Bug 11606] New: wanted: awareness of non-persistent web storage (Tuesday, 28 December)
• Web workers: synchronously handling events (Monday, 27 December)
• Re: [Bug 11606] New: wanted: awareness of non-persistent web storage (Sunday, 26 December)
• Re: Hash functions (Wednesday, 22 December)
• Re: Updates to FileAPI (Wednesday, 22 December)
• Re: Updates to FileAPI (Wednesday, 22 December)
• Re: Hash functions (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: Hash functions (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Hash functions (Tuesday, 21 December)
• file-system-api: filename restrictions (Sunday, 19 December)

Gregg Tavares (wrk)

• Re: FileAPI use case: making an image downloading app (Saturday, 18 December)
• FileAPI use case: making an image downloading app (Friday, 17 December)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Tuesday, 23 November)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Thursday, 18 November)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Thursday, 18 November)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Thursday, 18 November)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Monday, 15 November)
• requestAnimationFrame (Monday, 15 November)

Gregory J. Rosmaita

• PFWG requirements: enable device independent access to event handlers (Friday, 8 October)

Hajime Morita

• Re: Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Monday, 20 December)
• Re: Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Friday, 17 December)

Hallvord R. M. Steen

• Re: clipboard events (Friday, 24 December)
• clipboard events (Thursday, 23 December)

Henri Sivonen

• Use cases for Range::createContextualFragment and script nodes (Wednesday, 20 October)

Ian Hickson

• Re: Updates to FileAPI (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: Updates to FileAPI (Monday, 20 December)
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Wednesday, 15 December)
• Re: Call for Editors for Server-sent Events, Web Storage, and Web Workers (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: Call for Editors for Server-sent Events, Web Storage, and Web Workers (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: Call for Editors for Server-sent Events, Web Storage, and Web Workers (Monday, 13 December)
• Re: Call for Editors for Server-sent Events, Web Storage, and Web Workers (Monday, 13 December)
• Re: Seeking status of Server-sent Events, Web Storage and Web Workers (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: Seeking status of Server-sent Events, Web Storage and Web Workers (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: Structured clone in WebStorage (Friday, 3 December)
• Re: Seeking status of Server-sent Events, Web Storage and Web Workers (Monday, 29 November)
• Re: CfC: FPWD of Web Messaging; deadline November 13 (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: CfC: to publish Web SQL Database as a Working Group Note; deadline November 13 (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: CfC: to publish Web SQL Database as a Working Group Note; deadline November 13 (Saturday, 6 November)
• Re: CfC: FPWD of Web Messaging; deadline November 13 (Saturday, 6 November)
• Re: [Bug 10430] New: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: [progress-events] default action suggestion (Thursday, 14 October)

James Robinson

• Re: ISSUE-173 (ericu): terminal FileWriter progress events should be queued [File API: Writer] (Friday, 10 December)
• Re: [XHR2] responseType / response / overrideMimeType proposal (Monday, 29 November)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Thursday, 18 November)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Tuesday, 2 November)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Friday, 29 October)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Friday, 29 October)
• [XHR2] overrideMimeType behavior (Tuesday, 5 October)

Jean-Yves Bitterlich

• Re: Widgets and OAuth or other similar redirect-based protocols (Monday, 1 November)

Jeremy Orlow

• Re: [IndexedDB] Do we need a timeout for VERSION_CHANGE? (Friday, 17 December)
• Re: [IndexedDB] KeyRange factory methods (Friday, 17 December)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Do we need a timeout for VERSION_CHANGE? (Friday, 17 December)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Do we need a timeout for VERSION_CHANGE? (Thursday, 16 December)
• Re: [Bug 11375] New: [IndexedDB] Error codes need to be assigned new numbers (Wednesday, 15 December)
• Re: [Bug 11553] New: Ensure indexedDBSync is on the right worker interface (Wednesday, 15 December)
• Re: [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)? (Wednesday, 15 December)
• Re: [Bug 11375] New: [IndexedDB] Error codes need to be assigned new numbers (Wednesday, 15 December)
• Re: [Bug 11398] New: [IndexedDB] Methods that take multiple optional parameters should instead take an options object (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: [Bug 11398] New: [IndexedDB] Methods that take multiple optional parameters should instead take an options object (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: [Bug 11398] New: [IndexedDB] Methods that take multiple optional parameters should instead take an options object (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: [Bug 11398] New: [IndexedDB] Methods that take multiple optional parameters should instead take an options object (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: [Bug 11375] New: [IndexedDB] Error codes need to be assigned new numbers (Friday, 10 December)
• Re: [Bug 11406] New: [IndexedDB] IDBDatabase.transaction needs to specify exception for invalid mode parameter (Friday, 10 December)
• Re: [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)? (Friday, 10 December)
• Re: [Bug 11398] New: [IndexedDB] Methods that take multiple optional parameters should instead take an options object (Friday, 10 December)
• Re: [Bug 11394] New: We should throw if continue() is called with a key <= the current position (Friday, 10 December)
• Re: [Bug 11375] New: [IndexedDB] Error codes need to be assigned new numbers (Friday, 10 December)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Compound and multiple keys (Friday, 10 December)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Events and requests (Friday, 10 December)
• Re: continue as a reserved word and a conflict with IndexedDB (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: Structured clone in WebStorage (Sunday, 5 December)
• Re: Structured clone in WebStorage (Sunday, 5 December)
• Re: Structured clone in WebStorage (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: Structured clone in WebStorage (Thursday, 2 December)
• Structured clone in WebStorage (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)? (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: [Bug 11350] New: [IndexedDB] ObjectStores should have a way to hint that they're "evictable" (Friday, 19 November)
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: [Bug 11257] New: Should IDBCursor.update be able to create a new entry? (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] .value of no-duplicate cursors (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: [Bug 11257] New: Should IDBCursor.update be able to create a new entry? (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: [Bug 11257] New: Should IDBCursor.update be able to create a new entry? (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] .value of no-duplicate cursors (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: [Bug 11269] New: Evaluating keyPaths needs to be better specified (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: [Bug 11257] New: Should IDBCursor.update be able to create a new entry? (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] .value of no-duplicate cursors (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: [Bug 11280] New: IDBFactory.databases doesn't work (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Events and requests (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: IndexedDB TPAC agenda (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: [Bug 10430] New: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: IndexedDB TPAC agenda (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: [Bug 10430] New: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: IndexedDB TPAC agenda (Tuesday, 2 November)
• Re: IndexedDB TPAC agenda (Tuesday, 2 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] IDBKeyRange cleanup (Monday, 1 November)
• Re: IndexedDB TPAC agenda (Monday, 1 November)
• Re: [Bug 10430] New: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior (Monday, 1 November)
• Re: IndexedDB TPAC agenda (Monday, 1 November)
• Re: [Bug 10430] New: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior (Monday, 1 November)
• IndexedDB TPAC agenda (Monday, 1 November)
• Re: [Bug 10430] New: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior (Monday, 1 November)
• Re: [Bug 10430] New: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior (Monday, 1 November)
• Re: [Bug 10430] New: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior (Monday, 1 November)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Monday, 25 October)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Monday, 25 October)
• Re: [IndexedDB] IDBKeyRange cleanup (Sunday, 24 October)
• [IndexedDB] Should removeIndex/ObjectStore be renamed to match s/remove/delete/ elsewhere? (Tuesday, 19 October)

jguerin@shootingsoul.com

• PIPP network protocol (Tuesday, 7 December)

Jian Li

• Re: Updates to FileAPI (Monday, 20 December)
• Re: Updates to FileAPI (Friday, 17 December)
• Re: revokeObjectURL behavior (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: Updates to FileAPI (Monday, 15 November)
• Re: Updates to FileAPI (Thursday, 11 November)

Jimmy Forrester-Fellowes

• Interacting with notifications (Monday, 4 October)

Jonas Sicking

• Re: [IndexedDB] Why rely on run-to-completion? (Thursday, 30 December)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Why rely on run-to-completion? (Thursday, 30 December)
• Re: Web workers: synchronously handling events (Thursday, 30 December)
• Re: Web workers: synchronously handling events (Wednesday, 29 December)
• Re: Updates to FileAPI (Wednesday, 22 December)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Do we need a timeout for VERSION_CHANGE? (Friday, 17 December)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Do we need a timeout for VERSION_CHANGE? (Friday, 17 December)
• Re: [IndexedDB] KeyRange factory methods (Friday, 17 December)
• Re: [IndexedDB] versionchange event gone? (Wednesday, 15 December)
• Re: [Bug 11375] New: [IndexedDB] Error codes need to be assigned new numbers (Wednesday, 15 December)
• Re: [Bug 11398] New: [IndexedDB] Methods that take multiple optional parameters should instead take an options object (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: [Bug 11398] New: [IndexedDB] Methods that take multiple optional parameters should instead take an options object (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: ISSUE-173 (ericu): terminal FileWriter progress events should be queued [File API: Writer] (Saturday, 11 December)
• Re: [Bug 11406] New: [IndexedDB] IDBDatabase.transaction needs to specify exception for invalid mode parameter (Friday, 10 December)
• Re: [Bug 11406] New: [IndexedDB] IDBDatabase.transaction needs to specify exception for invalid mode parameter (Friday, 10 December)
• Re: [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)? (Friday, 10 December)
• Re: [Bug 11394] New: We should throw if continue() is called with a key <= the current position (Friday, 10 December)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Events and requests (Friday, 10 December)
• Re: A URL API (Tuesday, 7 December)
• Re: Structured clone in WebStorage (Thursday, 2 December)
• [IndexedDB] Compound and multiple keys (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: Local Storage Not Retaining Data Between Local Browser Sessions (Monday, 29 November)
• Re: [XHR2] responseType / response / overrideMimeType proposal (Monday, 29 November)
• Re: Local Storage Not Retaining Data Between Local Browser Sessions (Monday, 29 November)
• Re: [cors] 27 July 2010 CORS feedback (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: [cors] 27 July 2010 CORS feedback (Wednesday, 24 November)
• [ProgressEvents] How to deal with compressed transfer encodings (Tuesday, 23 November)
• Re: [cors] 27 July 2010 CORS feedback (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: [cors] 27 July 2010 CORS feedback (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: [cors] 27 July 2010 CORS feedback (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: [cors] 27 July 2010 CORS feedback (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)? (Saturday, 20 November)
• Re: [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)? (Saturday, 20 November)
• Re: revokeObjectURL behavior (Thursday, 18 November)
• Re: revokeObjectURL behavior (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re: revokeObjectURL behavior (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon (Tuesday, 16 November)
• revokeObjectURL behavior (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon (Saturday, 13 November)
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators (Saturday, 13 November)
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon (Saturday, 13 November)
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon (Saturday, 13 November)
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: [Bug 11280] New: IDBFactory.databases doesn't work (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: [Bug 11257] New: Should IDBCursor.update be able to create a new entry? (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: CfC: FPWD of Web Messaging; deadline November 13 (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: [Bug 11257] New: Should IDBCursor.update be able to create a new entry? (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] .value of no-duplicate cursors (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: [Bug 11257] New: Should IDBCursor.update be able to create a new entry? (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: [Bug 11257] New: Should IDBCursor.update be able to create a new entry? (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: Relational Data Model Example (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] .value of no-duplicate cursors (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: Making non-cookie requests to another domain... possible DoS attack by forcing session expiration? (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: Making non-cookie requests to another domain... possible DoS attack by forcing session expiration? (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Events and requests (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Need a method to remove a database (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: CfC: to publish Web SQL Database as a Working Group Note; deadline November 13 (Tuesday, 9 November)
• [IndexedDB] Events and requests (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Need a method to clear an object store (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] .value of no-duplicate cursors (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist (Monday, 8 November)
• [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: [Bug 10430] New: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: IndexedDB TPAC agenda (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: [Bug 10430] New: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: [Bug 10430] New: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Re: IndexedDB TPAC agenda (Tuesday, 2 November)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Monday, 1 November)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Monday, 1 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] IDBKeyRange cleanup (Monday, 1 November)
• Re: IndexedDB TPAC agenda (Monday, 1 November)
• Re: [Bug 10430] New: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior (Monday, 1 November)
• Re: IndexedDB TPAC agenda (Monday, 1 November)
• Re: [Bug 10430] New: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior (Monday, 1 November)
• Re: [Bug 10430] New: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior (Monday, 1 November)
• Re: [Bug 10430] New: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior (Monday, 1 November)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Saturday, 30 October)
• Re: [IndexedDB] IDBKeyRange cleanup (Friday, 29 October)
• Re: [Bug 11164] New: There is no way to get from an error event to other objectStores (Friday, 29 October)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Friday, 29 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: createBlobURL (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: createBlobURL (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: createBlobURL (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: createBlobURL (Monday, 25 October)
• [IndexedDB] IDBKeyRange cleanup (Saturday, 23 October)
• Re: Can we remove forminput and formchange events and related dispatch methods? (Friday, 22 October)
• Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18 (Thursday, 21 October)
• Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18 (Thursday, 21 October)
• Re: createBlobURL (Thursday, 21 October)
• Re: createBlobURL (Wednesday, 20 October)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Should removeIndex/ObjectStore be renamed to match s/remove/delete/ elsewhere? (Wednesday, 20 October)
• Re: createBlobURL (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Re: createBlobURL (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Re: createBlobURL (Monday, 18 October)
• Re: createBlobURL (Monday, 18 October)
• Re: createBlobURL (Monday, 18 October)
• Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18 (Monday, 11 October)
• Re: ISSUE-144 (propagation exceptions): exceptions in handlers during event propagation [DOM3 Events] (Wednesday, 6 October)
• Re: File descriptors (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Re: File descriptors (Monday, 4 October)

Joran Greef

• FileSystem API: Avoiding Upload Forms And Temporary Downloads (Monday, 29 November)

João Eiras

• Re: [Bug 11606] New: wanted: awareness of non-persistent web storage (Tuesday, 28 December)
• Re: Structured clone in WebStorage (Saturday, 4 December)

Julian Reschke

• Re: [cors] 27 July 2010 CORS feedback (Monday, 22 November)
• FileAPI editorial nit (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: [XHR2] HTTP Trailers (Sunday, 31 October)
• Re: [XHR2] HTTP Trailers (Saturday, 30 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: XML base after redirection (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: [XHR2] HTTP Trailers (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: [XHR2] HTTP Trailers (Tuesday, 26 October)

Keean Schupke

• Re: [IndexedDB] Why rely on run-to-completion? (Thursday, 30 December)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Why rely on run-to-completion? (Thursday, 30 December)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Why rely on run-to-completion? (Thursday, 30 December)
• Re: FileAPI use case: making an image downloading app (Sunday, 19 December)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Compound and multiple keys (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: [cors] 27 July 2010 CORS feedback (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: [cors] 27 July 2010 CORS feedback (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)? (Saturday, 20 November)
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators (Saturday, 13 November)
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators (Saturday, 13 November)
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators (Saturday, 13 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: Relational Data Model Example (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: Relational Data Model Example (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Relational Data Model Example (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Monday, 25 October)

Kenneth Rohde Christiansen

• Re: Rename XBL2 to something without X, B, or L? (Tuesday, 14 December)

Kris Zyp

• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist (Monday, 8 November)

kuehne@trustable.de

• Re: [widgets] Seeking review of Widgets Dig Sig Test Suite (Wednesday, 6 October)

lmarcetic@foi.hr

• Re: File descriptors (Monday, 4 October)
• File descriptors (Monday, 4 October)

Maciej Stachowiak

• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Thursday, 16 December)
• Re: Structured clone in WebStorage (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: Structured clone in WebStorage (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: CfC: FPWD of Web Messaging; deadline November 13 (Sunday, 7 November)
• Re: CfC: FPWD of Web Messaging; deadline November 13 (Sunday, 7 November)
• Re: [XHR2] HTTP Trailers (Sunday, 31 October)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Friday, 29 October)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Thursday, 28 October)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Thursday, 28 October)
• Re: Use cases for Range::createContextualFragment and script nodes (Thursday, 21 October)
• Re: Use cases for Range::createContextualFragment and script nodes (Thursday, 21 October)
• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Fwd: ECMA TC 39 WebIDL meeting open to W3C members (Monday, 11 October)

Manu Sporny

• Request for Last Call review of RDFa Core 1.1 (Thursday, 18 November)

Marcos Caceres

• [widget] proposal to add defaultlocale attribute to widget element (P&C Spec), was Re: [widgets] Span example (Monday, 27 December)
• Re: [widgets] Some possible i18n test bugs (Thursday, 9 December)
• Re: [widgets] Error in i18n tests for features (Friday, 3 December)
• Re: [widgets] Error in i18n tests for features (Friday, 3 December)
• Re: [widgets] Test widget has wrong content (Friday, 3 December)
• Re: [widgets] Error in test case "bm" (Friday, 3 December)
• Re: [widgets] test "bn" in error (Friday, 3 December)
• Re: Issue in DIgital Signature test suite (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: [Widgets] running widgets in a regular web page ??? (Friday, 26 November)
• [widgets] removed test-cases/ta-ZjcdAxFMSx/002/ (Thursday, 25 November)
• [widgets] Icon i18n width/height tests (Wednesday, 24 November)
• [widgets] Removed test-cases/ta-xGYcVTMoAX/000/ds.wgt (Wednesday, 24 November)
• [Widgets] Default values in P&C (Wednesday, 24 November)
• [widgets] VMMF Test suite (Tuesday, 23 November)
• Re: Comments on the http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/ (Thursday, 11 November)
• [widgets] Tiny bug in spec in section 9.1.16 (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: Comments on the http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/ (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: Widget packaging spec: make it clear in the Abstract or Intro that P&C widgets != UI controls (Sunday, 7 November)
• Re: Comments on the http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/ (Tuesday, 2 November)
• Re: Comment on Widget Interface... (Monday, 1 November)
• Re: Comments on the http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/ (Monday, 1 November)
• Re: ACTION-591: Checkin updates for issues 150 and 151 (Web Applications Working Group) (Monday, 1 November)
• Re: ISSUE-152: [widgets] P&C test suite needs a few more XML entity cases to check for well-formed XML (Friday, 22 October)
• Re: [Widgets] Mozilla open apps (Wednesday, 20 October)
• Re: Comment on Widget Interface... (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Re: [widgets] Best practice / recommendation for widget id scheme? (Saturday, 2 October)
• Re: [widgets] Widget API Test Suite Updated, was Re: ACTION-585: After TWI test suite updated, send an annoucement to public-webapps (Web Applications Working Group) (Saturday, 2 October)
• [widgets] Widget API Test Suite Updated, was Re: ACTION-585: After TWI test suite updated, send an annoucement to public-webapps (Web Applications Working Group) (Saturday, 2 October)

Mark Nottingham

• Re: [cors] 27 July 2010 CORS feedback (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: [cors] 27 July 2010 CORS feedback (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: [cors] 27 July 2010 CORS feedback (Monday, 22 November)
• [cors] 27 July 2010 CORS feedback (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: [DataCache] Status and plans for Programmable HTTP Caching and Serving? (Monday, 15 November)
• Re: [XHR2] HTTP Trailers (Tuesday, 26 October)
• [XHR2] HTTP Trailers (Thursday, 21 October)

Michael Chan

• 1st CFP: IJCAI-11 Workshop on Discovering Meaning On the Go in Large & Heterogeneous Data (LHD-11) (Saturday, 18 December)

Michael Nordman

• Re: Updates to FileAPI (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: Updates to FileAPI (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: revokeObjectURL behavior (Thursday, 18 November)
• Re: revokeObjectURL behavior (Thursday, 18 November)
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: [DataCache] Status and plans for Programmable HTTP Caching and Serving? (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: createBlobURL (Tuesday, 19 October)

Mike Hanson

• Re: [Widgets] Mozilla open apps (Wednesday, 20 October)

Mike Taylor

• Typo in http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets-apis/ Section 5.1.1 (Monday, 6 December)

Mikeal Rogers

• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Tuesday, 26 October)

Nathan

• Re: Embedding WebSocket Servers in Web Pages (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: [Widgets] running widgets in a regular web page ??? (Friday, 26 November)
• Questions about API Design, composability and multiple arguments (Saturday, 30 October)
• Re: Feedback requested on returning null/void or throwing an exception (Friday, 29 October)
• Feedback requested on returning null/void or throwing an exception (Thursday, 28 October)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: XML base after redirection (Tuesday, 26 October)

Nathan Kitchen

• Re: IndexedDB TPAC agenda (Tuesday, 2 November)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Wednesday, 27 October)

Nikunj Mehta

• Re: CfC: to publish Web SQL Database as a Working Group Note; deadline November 13 (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: IndexedDB TPAC agenda (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: IndexedDB TPAC agenda (Tuesday, 2 November)

Ojan Vafai

• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Friday, 19 November)

Oliver Hunt

• Re: continue as a reserved word and a conflict with IndexedDB (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: Structured clone in WebStorage (Friday, 3 December)
• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. (Tuesday, 19 October)

Olli Pettay

• Re: Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Thursday, 16 December)
• Re: Rename XBL2 to something without X, B, or L? (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Monday, 1 November)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Monday, 1 November)
• [Workers] NavigatorOnLine (Monday, 1 November)
• Re: Use cases for Range::createContextualFragment and script nodes (Thursday, 21 October)
• Re: [Widgets] Mozilla open apps (Wednesday, 20 October)
• Re: [progress-events] Update (Tuesday, 5 October)

Pablo Castro

• [IndexedDB] KeyRange factory methods (Thursday, 16 December)
• RE: [IndexedDB] Do we need a timeout for VERSION_CHANGE? (Thursday, 16 December)
• [IndexedDB] Do we need a timeout for VERSION_CHANGE? (Wednesday, 15 December)
• RE: [Bug 11553] New: Ensure indexedDBSync is on the right worker interface (Wednesday, 15 December)
• [IndexedDB] versionchange event gone? (Wednesday, 15 December)
• RE: [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)? (Wednesday, 15 December)
• RE: [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)? (Wednesday, 15 December)
• RE: [Bug 11375] New: [IndexedDB] Error codes need to be assigned new numbers (Wednesday, 15 December)
• RE: [Bug 11398] New: [IndexedDB] Methods that take multiple optional parameters should instead take an options object (Friday, 10 December)
• RE: [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)? (Saturday, 20 November)
• RE: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators (Wednesday, 10 November)
• RE: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators (Wednesday, 10 November)
• RE: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators (Wednesday, 10 November)
• RE: IndexedDB TPAC agenda (Tuesday, 2 November)
• RE: IndexedDB TPAC agenda (Monday, 1 November)
• RE: Seeking agenda items for WebApps' Nov 1-2 f2f meeting (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Explicitly stablishing the timing of clone creation (Tuesday, 5 October)

Patrick Mueller

• Re: continue as a reserved word and a conflict with IndexedDB (Monday, 6 December)

Paul Kinlan

• Re: using BlobBuilder append method with generated binary data (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: using BlobBuilder append method with generated binary data (Friday, 3 December)

Paul Libbrecht

• Re: clipboard events (Thursday, 23 December)
• Re: clipboard events (Sunday, 26 December)

Peter Dekkers

• Re: [Widgets] running widgets in a regular web page ??? (Friday, 26 November)
• [Widgets] running widgets in a regular web page ??? (Friday, 26 November)

Phillips, Addison

• RE: Comment on Widget Interface... (Thursday, 14 October)
• RE: Comment on Widget Interface... (Tuesday, 12 October)
• Re: Comment on Widget Interface... (Tuesday, 5 October)

Rich Tibbett

• [widgets] Widget Updates (Monday, 15 November)

Rob Crowther

• Re: Local Storage Not Retaining Data Between Local Browser Sessions (Monday, 29 November)

Robert O'Callahan

• Re: clipboard events (Monday, 27 December)
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Sunday, 12 December)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Tuesday, 23 November)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Saturday, 20 November)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Friday, 19 November)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Friday, 19 November)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Thursday, 18 November)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Thursday, 18 November)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Thursday, 18 November)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Thursday, 18 November)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Thursday, 18 November)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Thursday, 18 November)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Monday, 15 November)

Robin Berjon

• Re: Rename XBL2 to something without X, B, or L? (Thursday, 16 December)

Robin Winslow

• Re: DOM event detection (Tuesday, 21 December)
• DOM event detection (Monday, 20 December)

Ronald Lane

• Local Storage Not Retaining Data Between Local Browser Sessions (Sunday, 28 November)

Ryan Seddon

• Re: DOM event detection (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: using BlobBuilder append method with generated binary data (Monday, 20 December)

Sam Weinig

• Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18 (Friday, 15 October)

Scott Shattuck

• Re: DOM collections index out of bounds and JavaScript. (Tuesday, 19 October)

Scott Wilson

• Re: [widgets] Storage keys and ECMAScript incompatibility? (Wednesday, 15 December)
• [widgets] Storage keys and ECMAScript incompatibility? (Wednesday, 15 December)
• [widgets] Some possible i18n test bugs (Wednesday, 8 December)
• Re: [widgets] Error in i18n tests for features (Friday, 3 December)
• Re: [widgets] Error in i18n tests for features (Friday, 3 December)
• [widgets] Test widget has wrong content (Friday, 3 December)
• [widgets] Error in i18n tests for features (Friday, 3 December)
• [widgets] WARP test bugs (Wednesday, 1 December)
• [widgets] test "viewh" in error (Wednesday, 1 December)
• [widgets] test "bn" in error (Wednesday, 1 December)
• [widgets] Error in test case "bm" (Wednesday, 1 December)
• [widgets] missing tests? (Wednesday, 1 December)
• [widgets] test "dl" is in error (Wednesday, 1 December)
• [Embedding] running widgets in a regular web page ??? (Saturday, 27 November)
• Re: [Widgets] running widgets in a regular web page ??? (Friday, 26 November)
• Re: [Widgets] and OAuth or other similar redirect-based protocols (Monday, 1 November)
• Re: [Widgets] Mozilla open apps (Wednesday, 20 October)
• [Widgets] Mozilla open apps (Wednesday, 20 October)
• Re: Comment on Widget Interface... (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Re: Comment on Widget Interface... (Monday, 4 October)

Sergey Ilinsky

• Re: Can we remove forminput and formchange events and related dispatch methods? (Friday, 22 October)

Sergiu Dumitriu

• Re: [XHR2] Comments on the 7 September working draft (Monday, 4 October)

Shawn Wilsher

• Re: [IndexedDB] Why rely on run-to-completion? (Thursday, 30 December)
• Re: [Bug 11375] New: [IndexedDB] Error codes need to be assigned new numbers (Wednesday, 15 December)
• Re: [Bug 11398] New: [IndexedDB] Methods that take multiple optional parameters should instead take an options object (Friday, 10 December)
• Re: [Bug 11375] New: [IndexedDB] Error codes need to be assigned new numbers (Friday, 10 December)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Events and requests (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: [Bug 10430] New: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior (Monday, 1 November)
• Re: [Bug 11164] New: There is no way to get from an error event to other objectStores (Friday, 29 October)

Shiki Okasaka

• Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18 (Monday, 11 October)
• Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18 (Tuesday, 12 October)

Simon Pieters

• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Thursday, 11 November)

Steven Pemberton

• Re: [widgets] Draft agenda for 21 October 2010 voice conf (Thursday, 21 October)

Stewart Brodie

• Re: Use cases for Range::createContextualFragment and script nodes (Wednesday, 20 October)

Tab Atkins Jr.

• Re: [Bug 11606] New: wanted: awareness of non-persistent web storage (Tuesday, 28 December)
• Re: Web workers: synchronously handling events (Tuesday, 28 December)
• Re: Updates to FileAPI (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: Hash functions (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: Hash functions (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Friday, 17 December)
• Re: Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Thursday, 16 December)
• Re: Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Thursday, 16 December)
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Wednesday, 15 December)
• Re: Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Wednesday, 15 December)
• Re: Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Wednesday, 15 December)
• Fwd: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Wednesday, 15 December)
• Re: [widgets] Storage keys and ECMAScript incompatibility? (Wednesday, 15 December)
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Wednesday, 15 December)
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Wednesday, 15 December)
• Re: Rename XBL2 to something without X, B, or L? (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: XBL2: First Thoughts and Use Cases (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: Call for Editors for Server-sent Events, Web Storage, and Web Workers (Monday, 13 December)
• Re: Call for Editors for Server-sent Events, Web Storage, and Web Workers (Monday, 13 December)
• Re: Call for Editors for Server-sent Events, Web Storage, and Web Workers (Monday, 13 December)
• Re: Structured clone in WebStorage (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Compound and multiple keys (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: [XHR2] responseType / response / overrideMimeType proposal (Monday, 29 November)
• Re: requestAnimationFrame (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon (Saturday, 13 November)
• Re: Discussion of File API at TPAC in Lyon (Saturday, 13 November)
• Re: Updates to FileAPI (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: Updates to FileAPI (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: [Bug 11270] New: Interaction between in-line keys and key generators (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Behavior of IDBObjectStore.get() and IDBObjectStore.delete() when record doesn't exist (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType" (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Re: [XHR2] why have an asBlob attribute at all? (Friday, 29 October)
• Re: Replacing WebSQL with a Relational Data Model. (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: createBlobURL (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: createBlobURL (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: createBlobURL (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: createBlobURL (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Should removeIndex/ObjectStore be renamed to match s/remove/delete/ elsewhere? (Wednesday, 20 October)

Ted Guild

• [Important] W3C Account Phishing Scam (Wednesday, 27 October)

timeless

• Re: [widgets] Storage keys and ECMAScript incompatibility? (Wednesday, 15 December)
• Re: [widgets] Storage keys and ECMAScript incompatibility? (Wednesday, 15 December)
• Re: [widgets] Draft agenda for 18 November 2010 voice conf (Thursday, 18 November)
• Re: Widget packaging spec: make it clear in the Abstract or Intro that P&C widgets != UI controls (Sunday, 7 November)
• Re: [Widgets] Mozilla open apps (Wednesday, 20 October)
• Re: ISSUE-141 (IME examples): IME examples [DOM3 Events] (Sunday, 10 October)
• Re: ISSUE-137 (IME-keypress): Should keypress events fire when using an IME? [DOM3 Events] (Sunday, 10 October)
• Re: Seeking agenda items for WebApps' Nov 1-2 f2f meeting (Sunday, 10 October)
• Re: [widgets] Best practice / recommendation for widget id scheme? (Sunday, 10 October)
• Re: A URL API (Sunday, 10 October)
• Re: [widgets] Draft minutes from 23 September 2010 voice conf (Sunday, 10 October)
• Re: XHR2 proposal: support for informational responses (Sunday, 10 October)
• Re: ISSUE-122 (add mousewheel): Consider adding 'mousewheel' again [DOM3 Events] (Sunday, 10 October)

Toni Ruottu

• Re: Hash functions (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: using BlobBuilder append method with generated binary data (Monday, 20 December)
• Re: using BlobBuilder append method with generated binary data (Sunday, 12 December)
• Re: using BlobBuilder append method with generated binary data (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: using BlobBuilder append method with generated binary data (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: Embedding WebSocket Servers in Web Pages (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Embedding WebSocket Servers in Web Pages (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: using BlobBuilder append method with generated binary data (Tuesday, 16 November)
• using BlobBuilder append method with generated binary data (Wednesday, 20 October)

Travis Leithead

• RE: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18 (Thursday, 21 October)

Tyler Close

• Re: CORS & ISSUE-108 (Tuesday, 23 November)

viji

• Issue in DIgital Signature test suite (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: Comments on the http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/ (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: Comments on the http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/ (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Re: Comments on the http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/ (Tuesday, 2 November)
• Comments on the http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/ (Tuesday, 19 October)

Vivek Khurana

• Re: [Widgets] Mozilla open apps (Wednesday, 20 October)

Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker

• ISSUE-173 (ericu): terminal FileWriter progress events should be queued [File API: Writer] (Friday, 10 December)
• ISSUE-152: [widgets] P&C test suite needs a few more XML entity cases to check for well-formed XML (Tuesday, 19 October)
• ISSUE-151: [widgets] P&C Spec.... If feature-name is not a valid IRI, and required-feature is true, then the user agent must treat this widget as an invalid widget package. but doesnt say anything about the case when it is not required. (Tuesday, 19 October)
• ISSUE-150: [widgets] Email and param name and value as 'Keyword attributes' is causing confusion in Widgets P&C Spec (Tuesday, 19 October)
• ISSUE-149 (missing key values): The multiply and other key values are missing [DOM3 Events] (Wednesday, 13 October)
• ISSUE-148 (modularize d3e): Consider modularizing DOM3 Events [DOM3 Events] (Wednesday, 6 October)
• ISSUE-147 (event re-dispatching): re-dispatching an event that already has its flow started [DOM3 Events] (Wednesday, 6 October)
• ISSUE-146 (capture-phase targets): Capture-phase listeners invoked on targets [DOM3 Events] (Wednesday, 6 October)
• ISSUE-145 (event handler ordering): Ordering event handlers registered by different means [DOM3 Events] (Wednesday, 6 October)
• ISSUE-144 (propagation exceptions): exceptions in handlers during event propagation [DOM3 Events] (Wednesday, 6 October)
• ISSUE-143 (editorial d3e): DOM3 Events section 3 editorial errors [DOM3 Events] (Wednesday, 6 October)
• ISSUE-142 (multiple keypress): one keydown might fire multiple keypress/textInput events [DOM3 Events] (Wednesday, 6 October)
• ISSUE-141 (IME examples): IME examples [DOM3 Events] (Wednesday, 6 October)
• ISSUE-140 (textInput keydown keypress): textInput event as default action of both keydown and keypress? [DOM3 Events] (Wednesday, 6 October)
• ISSUE-139 (clarify key repeat): Define which events repeat when a key is held down [DOM3 Events] (Wednesday, 6 October)
• ISSUE-138 (keyboard mapping): Define "keyboard mapping" [DOM3 Events] (Wednesday, 6 October)
• ISSUE-137 (IME-keypress): Should keypress events fire when using an IME? [DOM3 Events] (Wednesday, 6 October)
• ISSUE-136 (getCoordsAt): Consider adding MouseEvent.getCoordsAt(element) (Wednesday, 6 October)
• ISSUE-135 (DOMAttributeChangeRequestEvent): Consider adding DOMAttributeChangeRequestEvent (Saturday, 2 October)

Webmaster

• Attn: Account Subscriber (Wednesday, 27 October)

潘松柏

• 答复: Call for Editors for Server-sent Events, Web Storage, and Web Workers (Thursday, 16 December)

Last message date: Thursday, 30 December 2010 23:43:21 UTC