- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:59:13 -0400
- To: Michael Nordman <michaeln@google.com>
- CC: Geoffrey Garen <ggaren@apple.com>, Darin Fisher <darin@chromium.org>, Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com>, Web Applications Working Group WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Eric Uhrhane <ericu@google.com>, Alexey Proskuryakov <ap@webkit.org>, Chris Marrin <cmarrin@apple.com>, jorlow@google.com, jamesr@chromium.org
On 10/27/10 3:46 PM, Michael Nordman wrote: > Note, by the way, that for XML and HTML types, one is required (per > current XHR spec) to instantiate an XML or HTML parser, > respectively, to produce the responseText (because the data can > declare its own encoding in things like <meta> tags). I'm not sure > whether that complicates the other interfaces being proposed.... I > guess they could do that under the hood. But they point is they'd > need to know the MIME type, not just the data. > > > So an XMLParser would need more than just the raw data, ok. That's obviously true, and isn't what I said... -Boris
Received on Wednesday, 27 October 2010 19:59:48 UTC