Re: XHR responseArrayBuffer attribute: suggestion to replace "asBlob" with "responseType"

On 10/27/10 2:28 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
> I think it's about performance as well as implementor convenience.  If
> the implementor knows up front that the data should be stored as a Blob,
> then the implementor can write the data to disk without having to waste
> memory.

I have no problem with hinting to the implementor that the result is 
expected to be used as a Blob so they can optimistically store it to 
disk.  My problem is with then making it impossible to get it as a 
string if needed later (which would just involve reading the data from 
disk into memory).


Received on Wednesday, 27 October 2010 07:05:12 UTC