Re: [Bug 11553] New: Ensure indexedDBSync is on the right worker interface

I believe the instance of WorkerUtils is much like window in a page.  I.e.
you put stuff on there that you want in the global scope.  Thus I'm pretty
sure that WorkerUtils is the right place for both.

J

On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 1:54 AM, <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org> wrote:

> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11553
>
>           Summary: Ensure indexedDBSync is on the right worker interface
>           Product: WebAppsWG
>           Version: unspecified
>          Platform: All
>        OS/Version: All
>            Status: NEW
>          Severity: normal
>          Priority: P2
>         Component: Indexed Database API
>        AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org
>        ReportedBy: pablo.castro@microsoft.com
>         QAContact: member-webapi-cvs@w3.org
>                CC: mike@w3.org, public-webapps@w3.org
>
>
> I just noticed that the async part of the spec has indexedDB in Worker
> (i.e.
> "Worker implements IDBEnvironment"), whereas the sync API has it
> WorkerUtils.
> The second one is probably just old, so for my current editing pass
> (bringing
> sync/async in sync) I'll just change it to "Worker" for consistency.
>
> However, from looking at the Web Workers spec [1] it seems that
> IDBEnvironmentSync should be implemented by AbstractWorker so it's
> available in
> regular and shared workers. Is that right? If not, what's the right spot?
>
> [1] http://dev.w3.org/html5/workers
>
> --
> Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug.
>
>