foaf:sha1 property with img src=
LC comment: clarify situation around document fragments containing RDFa
LC comment: Don't discriminate against "useless" triples
LC comment: describe the algorithm in functional terms too
LC comment: XSLT and conformance levels
new Primer
request for extension to review RDFa Last Call.
Progress on the RDFa GRDDL transform
- Re: Progress on the RDFa GRDDL transform
- RE: Progress on the RDFa GRDDL transform
- Re: Progress on the RDFa GRDDL transform
QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0011
- QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0099 (was: QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0011)
- RE: QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0099 (was: QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0011)
- Re: QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0099 (was: QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0011)
- RE: QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0099 (was: QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0011)
- Re: QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0099 (was: QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0011)
- RE: QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0099 (was: QueryParseException for SPARQL for test case 0011)
[RDFa TC] Updates as of 2008-03-27 telecon
Crazy Ivan can now generate EARL Reports
Meeting record: 2008-03-27 RDF-in-XHTML Task Force telecon
Different results of different RDFa extractors
Telecon Agenda, Thursday 27 March 2008, 1500 UTC == *EUROPE* still one hour earlier
- Re: Telecon Agenda, Thursday 27 March 2008, 1500 UTC == *EUROPE* still one hour earlier
- RE: Telecon Agenda, Thursday 27 March 2008, 1500 UTC == *EUROPE* still one hour earlier
[RDFa TC] update
librdfa 0.10.1 - Windows headers/binaries available
ISSUE-97: resolution from last week
Replace @instanceof with @kind
Comments on RDFa in XHTML Syntax draft
LC comment: Ambiguous "otherwise" step
LC comment: missing summary text
Request extension for last call comments
Reviewing Last Call RDFa
- Re: Reviewing Last Call RDFa
- Re: Reviewing Last Call RDFa
- Re: Reviewing Last Call RDFa
- Community outreach with a cheat sheet!
- Re: Community outreach with a cheat sheet!
- Re: Community outreach with a cheat sheet!
- RE: Community outreach with a cheat sheet!
- Re: Community outreach with a cheat sheet!
- RE: Community outreach with a cheat sheet!
- Re: Community outreach with a cheat sheet!
- Re: Community outreach with a cheat sheet!
- Re: Community outreach with a cheat sheet!
- Re: Community outreach with a cheat sheet!
- RE: Community outreach with a cheat sheet!
- Re: Community outreach with a cheat sheet!
- Re: Community outreach with a cheat sheet!
- RE: Community outreach with a cheat sheet!
- RE: Community outreach with a cheat sheet!
- Re: Community outreach with a cheat sheet!
- Re: Community outreach with a cheat sheet!
- RE: Community outreach with a cheat sheet!
- RE: Community outreach with a cheat sheet!
- Community outreach with a cheat sheet!
- Re: Community outreach with a cheat sheet!
Comments on "RDFa in XHTML: Syntax and Processing"
Updated distiller plus some new tests
Re: super easy issues: ISSUE-93, ISSUE-94, ISSUE-95
Re: ISSUE-96
meeting record: 2008-03-20 RDF-in-XHTML TF telecon
ISSUE-102: Last Call Comment: Better name than \'instanceof\' is needed
Meeting Agenda, Thursday 1500 UTC, still an hour early for Europeans
ISSUE-101: Last Call Comment: garbage collecting \"useless\" triples doesn\'t seem necessary and could hurt authors as they write RDFa
ISSUE-100: Last Call Comment: Bug in Step 11 of Processing rules, as evidenced by Test Case 58
RDFa Last Call Comment: garbage collecting "useless" triples doesn't seem necessary and could hurt authors as they write RDFa
- Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: garbage collecting "useless" triples doesn't seem necessary and could hurt authors as they write RDFa
- Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: garbage collecting "useless" triples doesn't seem necessary and could hurt authors as they write RDFa
- Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: garbage collecting "useless" triples doesn't seem necessary and could hurt authors as they write RDFa
ISSUE-99: Last Call Comment: Editorial Bug in @src example mistaken in Section 5.3
Possible solutions for ISSUE 97
- Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 97
The Self-Describing Web
Wrong link in RDFa Primer announcement
Fuzzbot - A Semantic Web Processor for Firefox
test suite in JavaScript thanks to Elias
Processing Step 10
markup stripping with @datatype
RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed
- Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed
- Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed
- Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed
- Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed
- Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed
- Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed
- Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed
- Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed
- RE: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed
- Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed
- Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed
- Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed
- Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed
- Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed
- Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed
- Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed
- Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed
- Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed
- Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed
- Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed
- Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed
- Is there any way to exclude prefixes from results?
- Re: Is there any way to exclude prefixes from results?
- Re: Is there any way to exclude prefixes from results?
- Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed
- Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed
- Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed
- New web app to automatically mark up sites with RDFa
- Re: New web app to automatically mark up sites with RDFa
- RE: New web app to automatically mark up sites with RDFa
- Re: New web app to automatically mark up sites with RDFa
Last Call processing in XSLT
Yahoo!, Bibleref, and RDFa
[RDFa Wiki] issues and feature request
ISSUE-98: URI escaping in SPARQL query in Recipe 6
ANNOUNCE: a new RDFa mailing list for web publishers.
librdfa implementation updated to Last Call processing rules
Crazy Ivan (RDFa Test Harness) upgrade
- Re: Crazy Ivan (RDFa Test Harness) upgrade
Yahoo to support Semantic Web
meeting record: 2008-03-13 RDF-in-XHTML TF telecon
Possible solutions for ISSUE 87
- Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 87
- Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 87
- Re: Possible solutions for ISSUE 87
Telecon Agenda, Thursday 13 March, *1500* UTC
update on RDFa wiki
ISSUE-1: Test on a closed ISSUE
Re: What is the correct set of triples for this case?
- Re: What is the correct set of triples for this case?
- Re: What is the correct set of triples for this case?
What is the correct triples for this case?
ISSUE-6 related to ISSUE-97?
RDFa wiki copyright
Topbraid supports RDFa
Yahoo microsearch looking at RDFa, too
RDFa wiki
Primer WD approved
[RDFa TC] interpretation of TC results - now implemented
Last Call compliant implementation
For Consideration: rapid approval of small updates the RDFa Primer
RDF/XML and CURIEs
Question about @src handling
Relationship between RDFa spec and CURIE spec
What format must an RDFa extractor service emit?
- Re: What format must an RDFa extractor service emit?
- Re: What format must an RDFa extractor service emit?
Did you guys see this?
RDFa Syntax Last Call Comment - Test 58 and Rule 11
ISSUE-88 resolution
RDFa Primer review
meeting record: 2008-03-06 RDF-in-XHTML TF telecon
- Re: meeting record: 2008-03-06 RDF-in-XHTML TF telecon
- Re: meeting record: 2008-03-06 RDF-in-XHTML TF telecon
Primer updated with a Changes section
- Re: Primer updated with a Changes section
- Re: Primer updated with a Changes section
- We need to start building a community (Re: Primer updated with a Changes section)
- Re: We need to start building a community (Re: Primer updated with a Changes section)
- Re: We need to start building a community (Re: Primer updated with a Changes section)
- Re: We need to start building a community (Re: Primer updated with a Changes section)
- Re: We need to start building a community (Re: Primer updated with a Changes section)
- Re: We need to start building a community (Re: Primer updated with a Changes section)
- Re: We need to start building a community (Re: Primer updated with a Changes section)
- Re: We need to start building a community (Re: Primer updated with a Changes section)
- RE: We need to start building a community (Re: Primer updated with a Changes section)
Edge Conditions in Processing Rules that might benefit from test cases
Agenda for Telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC.
a bit of levity
Call time changes next week
test case 0011
ISSUE-89 (was: Comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-rdfa-syntax-20080221)
super easy issues: ISSUE-93, ISSUE-94, ISSUE-95, ISSUE-96
- Re: super easy issues: ISSUE-93, ISSUE-94, ISSUE-95, ISSUE-96
- RE: super easy issues: ISSUE-93, ISSUE-94, ISSUE-95, ISSUE-96
- Re: super easy issues: ISSUE-93, ISSUE-94, ISSUE-95, ISSUE-96
Re: Comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-rdfa-syntax-20080221
- Re: Comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-rdfa-syntax-20080221
- Re: Comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-rdfa-syntax-20080221
- Re: Comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-rdfa-syntax-20080221
quick one: ISSUE-91
discussion and resolution of ISSUE-87
- Re: discussion and resolution of ISSUE-87
- Re: discussion and resolution of ISSUE-87
- Re: discussion and resolution of ISSUE-87
Regrets for 6 March
latest Primer edits
RDFa Syntax Last Call comment - section 5.4.3
RDFa Syntax Last Call Comment - typo in section 5.4
EARL Report(s) for ARC
Re: RDFa test case #1 missing @profile?
- Re: RDFa test case #1 missing @profile?
- Re: RDFa test case #1 missing @profile?