- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:37:44 -0500
- To: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>
- CC: zimmermann@accesstechnologiesgroup.com, Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>, Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@ieee.org>, wai-liaison@w3.org, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
Well - the W3C process on this is pretty clear. If a working group wishes to submit last call comments as a working group position, then the working group needs to approve them. Of course any individual is free to submit any comments they want. But I assume Gottfried has been tasked by the PFWG to draft a working group position, so they need to approve it. Mark Birbeck wrote: > Hi Gottfried, Al and Ben, > > Great to hear that Gottfried is able to provide a review. > > >> I think i will have something by April 4, but i may not make it to the PF >> call on April 2. So PF might need until April 9 to review my comments and >> commit to a agreed version of them. >> > > Speaking as someone who is not very good on the minutiae of W3C > process, that does sound like an unnecessary formality. After all, Al > began this thread by saying that the group had only just found a > reviewer, and with respect to the rest of the group, aren't > Gottfried's comments going to be most considered...so to speak? > > So why can't we just accept all of Gottfried's comments for consideration? > > Regards, > > Mark > > -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Friday, 28 March 2008 21:38:44 UTC