- From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 09:17:49 -0800
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
On Mar 7, 2008, at 8:34 AM, Manu Sporny wrote: > I don't think more pages like the Primer or Syntax document is going > to > fix this particular set of issues. I agree, we need to have a Primer that gives people enough of a sense of "this is useful and cool, I should read more," and leave further education to a more nimble process/community. > - A clean/simple website directing people to various RDFa resources - > like rdfa.info - but cleaner and less generic. Let's make sure it stays rdfa.info. We can improve the design if we have time, although I think that's not the first priority. > - A modern, skinnable, extensible wiki (such as MediaWiki) yes. > - An RDFa wiki at an easy to remember URI: http://rdfa.info/wiki yes > - Mailing list for: discussion about using RDFa yes, although let's be sure not to fragment too much. We have a mailing list for the spec, and I'm open to *one* more mailing list for users/authors. The existing list should remain for developers and in- depth syntax discussion. I don't want to branch any more than that. The CC hosting seems like a good direction to follow, since that doesn't add any more dependencies than we already have, and the CC admins have been super responsive to all of my requests. I would prefer W3C hosting in a perfect world, but I fear that will take longer to set up than we need. -Ben
Received on Friday, 7 March 2008 17:17:56 UTC