- From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>
- Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:00:57 +0000
- To: "Elias Torres" <elias@torrez.us>
- Cc: "Ben Adida" <ben@adida.net>, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
Hi Elias,
:)
Sorry if it caused confusion, but the the idea was to use wording that
fitted with the XPath data model, in an attempt to reduce ambiguities,
which does make it sound a little 'formal'. So 'child text node' is
the generic term, but that might be 'innerText' in an implementation
based on the HTML DOM, 'node.text' in an XML DOM-based implementation,
and so on.
Regards,
Mark
On 20/03/2008, Elias Torres <elias@torrez.us> wrote:
>
> doh!
>
>
> -Elias
>
>
> Ben Adida wrote:
> > Elias Torres wrote:
> >> The actual literal is either the value of @content (if present) or a
> >> string created by concatenating the value of all descendant text
> >> nodes, of the [current element] in turn.
> >>
> >> "all descendant text nodes" but what I had to do to pass the test is
> >> the textContent of all descendants. Let me know if they are the same
> >> thing.
> >
> > Is there a difference? I thought that's what textContent does?
> >
> > -Ben
>
>
--
Mark Birbeck
mark.birbeck@x-port.net | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232
http://www.x-port.net | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com
x-port.net Ltd. is registered in England and Wales, number 03730711
The registered office is at:
2nd Floor
Titchfield House
69-85 Tabernacle Street
London
EC2A 4RR
Received on Thursday, 20 March 2008 11:01:37 UTC