ISSUE-6 related to ISSUE-97?

Hi all,

I have a long-standing action to remind folks about ISSUE-6:

http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/6

which suggests that we should preserve the running value of @xml:lang in 
XMLLiterals.

I have a feeling that, if we can resolve ISSUE-97 (create well-formed 
XMLLiterals with all of the proper namespaces), then we can resolve 
ISSUE-6 by saying "just add xml:lang to the top-level element that 
already holds the namespaces".

And, if we don't preserve namespaces, then it's hard to argue that we 
should preserve xml:lang.

So I propose that we figure out ISSUE-97 first, then decide what to do 
with ISSUE-6.

-Ben

Received on Wednesday, 12 March 2008 17:47:49 UTC