W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > March 2008

RE: test case 0005

From: Hausenblas, Michael <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 15:46:04 +0100
Message-ID: <768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D298520157BD22@RZJC2EX.jr1.local>
To: "Johannes Koch" <koch@w3development.de>
Cc: <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>


Thanks for pointing this out. I was soooo close to updating it when I
suddenly encountered that this TC has been rejected [1]. This means that
TC5 no longer exists, hence will not be taken into consideration.

Anyway, thanks for the eagle eyes and please let me know if you spot
some more bugs (in 'approved' or 'on-hold' TC ;)


[1] http://www.w3.org/2007/06/28-rdfa-minutes.html#item02

 Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
 Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
 JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH

>-----Original Message-----
>From: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf-request@w3.org 
>[mailto:public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of 
>Johannes Koch
>Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 3:27 PM
>To: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
>Subject: test case 0005
>in test case 0005 
>there is an @href attribute containing a CURIE:
>   href="[cclicenses:by/nc-nd/2.5/]"
>However, section "5.4.4. Use of CURIEs in Specific Attributes" 
>(http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/#sec_5.4.4.) states that "@href and 
>@src support only a URI" (in contrast to @about and @resource, which 
>"support either a URI or a CURIE (expressed as a [safe CURIE] )").
>Johannes Koch
>In te domine speravi; non confundar in aeternum.
>                             (Te Deum, 4th cent.)
Received on Monday, 3 March 2008 14:47:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:01:55 UTC