- From: David Peterson <david@squishyfish.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 19:52:41 +1000
- To: <info@weborganics.co.uk>
- Cc: "'W3C RDFa task force'" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
G'day Martin, Just tried it, wow, that is cool... Gives me a lot of good ideas for an article or so :) Cheers, David > -----Original Message----- > From: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rdf-in- > xhtml-tf-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Martin McEvoy > Sent: Wednesday, 26 March 2008 5:25 AM > To: David Peterson > Cc: 'Ben Adida'; 'Shane McCarron'; 'Ivan Herman'; 'W3C RDFa task force' > Subject: RE: Community outreach with a cheat sheet! > > > Hello David > > On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 01:48 +1000, David Peterson wrote: > > Hello Ben, > > > > That is what was what I had intended. I did not want to re-invent > anything, just wanted to highlight a XFN to RDFa mapping. I was giving > an example from the XFN microformat [1]. > > > > I have a version of the RDFa Distiller That detects all XFN values[1] > (rel@tag, VoteLinks and rel@nofollow too), in pretty much the same way > as the Normal Distiller[2] Detects HTML @rel values, I think XFN and > other elemental microformats like rel="tag", and Votelinks are useful > as > an example of how authors are already using RDFa like techniques in > their markup and how easy it is to adopt RDFa without really inventing > anything. > > > 1 http://weborganics.co.uk/pyRdfa-XFN/?uri=http://tantek.com/ > 2 http://www.w3.org/2007/08/pyRdfa/ > > Thanks > Martin McEvoy > > ----------------- > > XFN 1.1 > > rel="contact" > > rel="acquaintance" > > rel="friend" > > rel="met" > > rel="co-worker" > > - snip - > > > ----------------- > > > > My example URI (http://rdfa.info/2008/03/xfn#co-worker) probably > stank, but that is why I am bringing it up here so I (we) can get > started. > > > > The main reason I want to kick this off is for an article I am > writing for SitePoint on how microformatters can benefit from RDFa > whilst using what is familiar. Yahoo! will only be indexing 5 of the 98 > or so and FireFox 3 parses the same 5 I believe. So, when SearchMonkey > kicks in there will be a lot of unhappy campers -- that is until we > Semantify 'Em! > > > > So maybe XFN wasn't the best example to pick. Yahoo! will extract: > hCard, hCalendar, hReview, hAtom, and XFN. What would be a better > vocab? > > > > Cheers, > > > > David > > > > [1] http://gmpg.org/xfn/11 > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Ben Adida [mailto:ben@adida.net] > > > Sent: Wednesday, 26 March 2008 1:25 AM > > > To: David Peterson > > > Cc: 'Shane McCarron'; 'Ivan Herman'; 'W3C RDFa task force' > > > Subject: Re: Community outreach with a cheat sheet! > > > > > > David Peterson wrote: > > > > http://rdfa.info/2008/03/xfn#co-worker > > > > > > I'd prefer if we worked on re-using existing vocabularies rather > than > > > re-inventing them wholesale :) But, of course, the beauty of RDFa > is > > > that I have no say :) > > > > > > -Ben > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 26 March 2008 09:53:25 UTC