Re: Comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-rdfa-syntax-20080221

Johannes,

You had raised an issue (ISSUE-91) as follows:

> A. Other XML Languages
> 
> "If a language includes @xml:base [XMLBASE], an RDFa parser for that 
> host language must process it, and use its value to set [base]."
> Is this a requirement? The section is marked "informative".

As per our last telecon [1], we have agreed to the following resolution:

"we remove the xml:base example, and move the xml:base description 
(minus example) into the main text, removing appendix A."

-Ben

[1] http://www.w3.org/2008/03/13-rdfa-minutes

Received on Thursday, 20 March 2008 01:22:18 UTC