W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > March 2008

Re: Last Call compliant implementation

From: Elias Torres <elias@torrez.us>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:11:23 -0400
Cc: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
Message-Id: <6784FE3F-7885-42ED-89FE-CBA3619FE390@torrez.us>
To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>

Which new tests? I'm working against 75 approved tests from the  
manifest.

-Elias

On Mar 11, 2008, at 11:17 AM, Manu Sporny wrote:

>
> Ivan Herman wrote:
>> I saw Michael referred to some already. Afaik, Manu's implementation:
>>
>> http://rdfa.digitalbazaar.com/librdfa/
>
> I'm in the process of updating librdfa to the Last Call spec (started
> last night). So beware, not all new test cases will pass!
>
> Also, note that librdfa has been placed under the LGPL v3... I'm  
> trying
> LGPL v3 out, but it makes me nervous - I don't know if it might stop
> corporations that have patents that are not related to librdfa from
> using librdfa in their product. Does anybody have experience with  
> this?
>
> It looks like LGPL v3 hooks into GPL v3 in a strange way that I don't
> remember existing in the GPL v2.
>
> -- manu
>
> PS: The real reason for the switch from LGPL v2 to LGPL v3 is the cool
> LGPLv3 icon they have: http://www.gnu.org/graphics/ 
> lgplv3-147x51.png :)
>
> -- 
> Manu Sporny
> President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> blog: RDFa Basics (video)
> http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2008/01/07/rdfa-basics
>
Received on Tuesday, 18 March 2008 03:12:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:01:56 UTC