Re: discussion and resolution of ISSUE-87

Ben Adida wrote:
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> ISSUE-87: http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/87
>
> should be relatively easy for us to resolve (like most issues we have 
> so far). Please read and respond with +1 or -1 to each point (with 
> explanation if necessary).
>
>
> ===========
> PROPOSED RESOLUTION:
> - 5.3: move the @rel to a parent element, so that @src can complete it 
> appropriately. (currently using old syntax for @src.)
+1
>
> - 5.4: accept Johannes's proposed text to clarify non-prefixed CURIEs 
> not yielding anything.
+1 - but see also issue 96 which I think relates.
>
> - 5.5: in three parts:
>
> (a) remove the wording "Note that final value of the [current object 
> resource] will either be null (from initialization), a full URI or a 
> bnode." as, according to MarkB [1], this is now part of Step 8.
+1
>
> (b) fix closing of <li>
+10
>
> (c) fix step (10) (which will become step 9 because of the <li> fix) 
> by moving sub-step 3 to first position, as per MarkB [1], so that 
> typed literals are checked first.
+1
> ===========
>
> -Ben
>
> [1] 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Feb/0117.html 
>
>

-- 
Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com

Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2008 13:27:35 UTC