W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > March 2008

Re: RDFa Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed

From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:25:07 -0500
Message-ID: <47E2D633.203@aptest.com>
To: Elias Torres <elias@torrez.us>
CC: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, David Peterson <david@squishyfish.com>, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org

We cannot use @type I don't think - it is already used in XHTML / XHTML 
2 in all sorts of ways - so it would be in conflict in a global 
attribute.  Sorry!

Elias Torres wrote:
>
>
>
> Dan Brickley wrote:
>>>>
>>
>> I prefer 'typeof' to 'instanceof'. I prefer 'type' to 'typeof'. I 
>> suspect (monolingually) that single words may be preferable to 
>> compounds, from an internationalisation perspective.
>
> +1 type > typeof > instanceof.
>
> I'm sure it was mentioned before, but what about @kind ?
>
> -Elias

-- 
Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Thursday, 20 March 2008 21:26:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:01:56 UTC